<em>The Electoral College discourages third parties because they consider that a third-party candidate must have a full and proven background with a solid and ample political base that can support him/her</em>. Usually, third-party candidates do not have the money to establish a formal and large team to run a political campaign. Often, they not have the resources to compete against Republican of Democratic candidates.
Among the recent independent candidates that have more presence in the campaigns was George Wallace in 1948, Ross Perot in 1996, and Ralph Nader in 2000.
I think the Electoral College encourages third-party candidates. However, third-party candidates<span> rarely win </span>election<span> in American campaigns. </span>Third-party candidates can<span> shift national attention to particular issues. </span>Third-party candidates can<span> take votes away from major political </span>party candidates<span>, influencing the outcome of </span>elections<span>.</span>
Some Americans found Malcoms views and ideas alarming because they believed he was an extremist. He did not believe in peaceful protest as King did, he wasnt against but was for violence or “fighting back”.
Imperio Bizantino haya sido un estado teocrático quiere decir que el emperador o basileus era considerado el representantede Dios en la tierra y ostentaba el poder político y religioso
The reason why surveying a different number of people or different population of people can possibly change the percentages that you calculated is because these surveys are simply "samples" of the general population as a whole, and are not exact in terms of their results given any random sample.
