How did the deregulation of media contribute to the success of televangelists such as Jerry Falwell?

History

2 answers:

pickupchik [31]2 years ago

7 0

The main cause for successful radio and television preachers was that religious programming on television experienced a surge in popularity in the 1980s

<h3>What was deregulation?</h3>

The deregulation was a measure to allow the transmission of programs by radio and television.

<h3>How did deregulation influence the success of televangelists?</h3>

Televangelists are people who used radio and television to broadcast programs preaching the Bible and other religious doctrines and receiving donations in return.

This form of preaching was very successful during the 1980s causing these preachers to become millionaires in a short time with the help of donations from the parishioners who tuned in to their programs.

Learn more about televangelists in: brainly.com/question/455769

love history [14]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

B. Religious programming on television experienced a surge in popularity in the 1980s

Explanation:

You might be interested in

PLSSS HELP IMMEDIATELY!! in the story prisoner b-3087, tell this story from the sick boys point of view. i’ll mark brainiest wit

deff fn [24]

Answer:

link

Explanation:

DONT CLICK OR COPY AND PASTE THE LINK ANYWHERE IT IS HUMAN TRAFFICING THEY WILL TRACK YOU THIS IS CONFIRMED BY ALL THE MISSING PEOPLE!!

just looking out for you babes.

Stay safe ❤

4 0

2 years ago

According to truman, what was one of the primary objectives of united states foreign policy?

jonny [76]

According to Truman, What was one of the primary objectives of United States foreign policy?

Correct Answer" It's defected are always visible and under democratic processes can be pointed out and corrected.
Good luck! :)

5 0

2 years ago

1. Describe what bias means, along with three guidelines you can follow to help you decide whether a source is overly biased. (4

Inessa [10]

We can say that a person is biased when their opinion or recollection of something favors one <u>person, idea, or group</u> more so than the other. It is the inability to remain impartial.

Though it cannot be denied that the statement that was given by Lum May as to the events of November 3rd, 1885 may be biased, I do not believe his account of the occurrence is overly biased. He describes the violent nature of the altercation, the burning down of Chinese homes, and the trauma that overtook the sanity of his wife.

All of these statements made by Lum May are backed by evidence such as:

The piles of ashes where Chinese homes once stood
A similar recollection of the events from hundreds of Chinese citizens who were present
The unstable nature of his wife's mental health.

All of this leads us to believe that Lum May is a credible source for the events of <em>November 3rd, 1885 </em>in Tacoma.

Unlike the credible testimony of Lum May, we can infer that the letter from James Wickersham is not only extremely biased in nature, but also an overwhelmingly unreliable source of information. Many of the participants of that day were indicted for their actions, giving Mr. Wickersham much to lose were he to provide accurate information.

The evidence supporting the statements of Lum May allows us to infer that her recollection of the events is credible and not overly swayed by bias. However, the contradictory statements declared by James Wickersham and the repercussions he may face should he tell the truth, point towards his letter being an unreliable and overly biased source.

To learn more visit:

brainly.com/question/25061293?referrer=searchResults

8 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Map of the mexican cession

jeyben [28]

Here you go. is this what you'er looking for?