1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex_Xolod [135]
2 years ago
5

How did the crusade contribute to the renaissance?

History
1 answer:
frosja888 [35]2 years ago
8 0

The crusades made several reformations in trade policies and religious inhibitions during the Age of Renaissance in Europe.

<h3>What happened during the Age of Renaissance?</h3>

The entry of Crusades made the biggest impact on the Age of Renaissance. In the first Crusade, it was held that a true Christian must fight to virtue Jerusalem from the hands of the Muslims.

In the period of the Second Crusades, Pope established stronger relationships of trade between Europe and other global powers in the world.

These important decisions by the crusaders paved the way for critical transformations in Europe during the Age of Renaissance.

Hence, it may be held that the efforts of crusades made the Age of Renaissance, a successful one in Europe.

Learn more about Age of Renaissance here:

brainly.com/question/12365814

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Why was Fort Sumter of strategic importance to the North and the South?
Colt1911 [192]
North: They had troops, guns, equipment, and provisions inside, and they owned it, and so they wanted to keep it.
South: It was located in the South, and they thought it was rightfully theirs, and that is why they wanted it

It didn't really have any strategic importance, however, it had political importance


hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe how the relations between the Jamestown settlers and Powhatan Indians changed over time.
mariarad [96]

Answer:

Explanation:

The interdependence of the English and the Powhatans many times seemed one-sided when the English were in desperate need of food and that provided by the local Indians was the only thing between their survival and their demise. The Powhatans’ understanding of the environment and geography was also very important to the Jamestown settlers in mapping the region. For their part, the Powhatans, though wary of the motivations of the English, were very interested in barter, especially in acquiring guns, hatchets, lead musket balls, metal tools and European copper. In addition to the corn they needed from the Indians, the English later came to desire local animal furs, especially beaver pelts, which were then exported to England for use in felt hat production. The colonists learned that the Powhatans wanted English cloth, especially wool, because they did not have comparable materials from which to make clothing and blankets. The Powhatans were accustomed to using traditional stone, shell or bone tools, but soon found that English-made metal tools were more durable and held a sharp edge longer. The strong desire for trade on the part of both parties fueled the off-and-on relationship for years to come. The Indians and settlers understood each other’s needs and desires well enough for successful barter in small-scale items, but their ideas about land ownership and use posed more significant obstacles. The Powhatans did not interpret the concept of “selling” land in the same way as the English purchasers. When the Powhatans continued to hunt on land that the English considered their possession, conflict was a common result.

Captain John Smith had much success initially in obtaining food, farming advice, and geographical knowledge from the Powhatans. Indeed, the fact that the colony managed to survive at all was in large part due to the ability of Smith to speak and negotiate with the Indian tribes. However, by early 1609, his tactics became more aggressive and his tenure with the colony was not long, as an injury sustained in a gunpowder explosion caused him to return to England in the fall of 1609. After his departure, hostility grew between the English and the Powhatans. With the development of new settlements over the next four years, the English began pushing the Powhatans off their land, which fronted the rivers. Fighting between the groups was common, with raids on each other’s land and kidnappings. As more plantations were established along the James River after 1616, relations continued to deteriorate, with both cultures claiming use of the land.

Almost from the first interactions between the two cultures, both groups used hostages or sent intermediaries to learn one another’s languages in order to serve as interpreters. It was hoped that this would encourage “good behavior” on both sides. Nothing seemed to work for very long. The 1613 kidnapping of Pocahontas, a daughter of Wahunsonacock, her baptism as “Rebecca” and her eventual marriage to John Rolfe in 1614 are perhaps the most famous of these interactions. A period of relative calm between the English and the Powhatans did occur after these events.

After Wahunsonacock died in 1618, his brother Opechancanough became ruler. Opechancanough worked to win the trust of the settlers, entering into agreements for land and reciprocal defense, among other things. In reality, Opechancanough believed that the English had treated his people like a subjugated nation – collecting payment of tribute in corn and, in some cases, reducing them to dependence by removing them from their lands. Opechancanough was patient and waited until the time was right. In 1622, he led the first coordinated attack on several English plantations, killing more than 300 of the 1,200 colonists. Jamestown was warned and escaped destruction. This led to a decade of open warfare, culminating in a treaty in 1632. A decade of tenuous peace followed.

Prior to these attacks in 1622, the Virginia Company had dramatically increased the number of colonists sent to Virginia every year, and the population had tripled within three years, threatening Powhatan territory between the York and James Rivers. By 1622, Indians were forced to move inland away from their traditional river valley homes. The lack of communication that existed between the two groups in 1607 did not improve sufficiently to bridge cultural differences as deep and sensitive as land ownership. As a result of the treaty in 1632, the English tried to limit contact between the Indians and the colonists, including limiting trade. In 1646, after a second Indian uprising and the death of more than 400 colonists, the Powhatans suffered a final defeat and signed a formal peace treaty with the Virginia government. This treaty barred the Indians from traveling on the James-York peninsula.

3 0
3 years ago
Explain a driving force behind European imperialism in Africa
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

Driving Force Behind European Imperialism in Africa

Explanation:

<h2>Scramble for Africa</h2>

Everybody was taking the Africans land and resources and them. The European’s flurry of colonizing Africa.

It is important to WG because it was wrong and started a lot of trading slaves.

<h2>National Pride</h2>

When you think your type of skin and where you came from is the best.

It is important to WG because it started wars and taking of slaves.

<h2>Technology and Imperialism</h2>

White men had guns so they took land and slaves.

It is important to WG because White Men took human beings from their homes. How would you like it if they came in your home and took your family.

<h2>Resources and Imperialism</h2>

The White Men didn’t just take the Africans they took there resources.

It is important to WG because it left nothing of Africa.

<h2>trans-Atlantic slave trade</h2>

– Existed in Africa before the coming of the Europeans

It is important to WG because there was trading before the Europeans came.

7 0
3 years ago
This is my last question or else I fail pls
lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer: B

Explanation: Cotton had become the most valuable crop of the South and comprised 59% of the exports from the United States during the Civil War.

3 0
2 years ago
In what way did the burning of Washington D.C. benefit the Americans? American nationalism increased, creating an influx of volu
KATRIN_1 [288]
American nationalism increased, creating an influx of volunteers for the military.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the weaknesses of the Articles lead to the writing of a new federal constitution
    13·1 answer
  • the states have______ powers that are the constitution does not grant to the national government but does not deny to the states
    14·2 answers
  • What did John Locke equate with liberty?
    8·1 answer
  • How could the federal government put millions to work during the great depression
    13·1 answer
  • What was a characteristic of American companies in the 1920s?
    10·1 answer
  • Anyone know this question ‍♂️
    5·1 answer
  • What kinds of goods did the Aztecs receive in tribute from conquered people?
    15·2 answers
  • What was Prime Minister George Grenville's policy toward the colonies?
    10·1 answer
  • Religious teacher who preached a new
    5·1 answer
  • How does the Federal Reserve control the money supply?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!