A misconception about financial literacy is that someone who's poor isn't managing his money well.
<h3>What is financial literacy?</h3>
It should be noted that financial literacy implies the need to understand how money works. It should be noted One of the common myths regarding financial literacy is "having a lot of money." Being financially literate does not imply being wealthy. It means you understand proper money management, including beneficial and harmful habits.
Making money idle and not investing it in something that will allow it to grow are two negative money management strategies.
Also, a misconception about financial literacy is that someone who's poor isn't managing his money well.
Learn more about financial literacy on:
brainly.com/question/1730033
#SPJ1
Confort zone refers to the brunch of situations at which a specific individual feels comfortable. He/She knows perfectly how to act and react in that environment and it does not suppose a challenge to perform properly in these situations.
On the contrary, when someome steps out of the comfort zone starts to feel vulnerable, hesitates and needs to think many times about the next step in the path. But for many, like the users of the sentence "''life begins at the end of your comfort zone'' feeling the risk and achieving to overcome, is actually what makes you feel alive.
Answer:
The first uses dialogue and character; the second uses first-person point of view.
Explanation:
The first excerpt is found in Chapter Eight titled "September 2nd, 1973" from <em>Fever 1793</em> by Laurie Halse Anderson is based on the yellow fever epidemic that ravaged Philadelphia. The story is from the point of view of the young Mattie Cook, describing how the pandemic had destroyed the lives of the people.
The second excerpt is from <em>The Summer of the Pestilence</em> by George Dodd Armstrong. The book also deals with the history of the same yellow fever that not only affected Philadelphia but also other parts of the nation such as Virginia.
While both books deal with the same pandemic, their dealing with the issue of unprecedented deaths differ a bit. The first book uses a dialogue-conversation approach, with the characters greatly involved whereas the second book uses the first person point of view to address the deaths. These two books may deal with the same issue but their approaches of the deaths and sick people differ such that their narrative plots also differ.
I believe the term is Syntax.
