1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stich3 [128]
2 years ago
6

What is the difference between renters insurance for the ""full replacement cost"" vs renters insurance for the ""cash value"" o

f your items?.
Business
1 answer:
Rainbow [258]2 years ago
4 0

The difference between the "full replacement cost" and the "cash value" renters insurance is one involves full replacement cost and the other depreciated value.

<h3>What is renters insurance?</h3>

Renter's insurance is the property insurance that covers the (renter's) policyholder's personal belongings, liability, and some living expenses in case of a loss event.

With replacement cost renters insurance, the policyholder has sufficient funds to replace all insured belongings and other losses.

With cash value renters insurance, the policyholder can only recover the depreciated value of their assets.

Thus, the difference between the "full replacement cost" and the "cash value" renters insurance is one involves full replacement cost and the other depreciated value.

Learn more about renters insurance at brainly.com/question/1973043

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Mackenzie is responsible for buying a week's supply of food and medication for the puppies and kittens at a local shelter. the f
Ira Lisetskai [31]
The budget is $4,240.

There are 164 kittens and 24 puppies.
Let
x = amount spent on each kitten
y =  amount spent on each puppy.

The cost for each puppy is twice a much as that for a kitten. Therefore
y = 2x                  (1)

The available amount is $4,240, therefore
164x + 24y = 4240          (2)

Substitute (1) into (2).
164x + 24(2x) = 4240
212x = 4240
x = $20
y = 2x = $40

Answer: $40 for each puppy.

7 0
3 years ago
Stockholders' equity totaled $94,000 at the beginning of the year. During the year, net income was $24,000, dividends of $9,000
Tomtit [17]

Answer:

$131,000

Explanation:

The computation of the ending balance of stockholder equity is shown below:

= Beginning balance of stockholder equity + net income - dividend paid + additional common stock issued

= $94,000 + $24,000 - $9,000 + $22,000

= $131,000

Therefore, the ending balance of stockholder equity is $131,000

We simply added the net income and the additional common stock issued and deduct the dividend paid to the beginning balance of stockholder equity so that the ending balance could come

7 0
3 years ago
Assume you sell short 100 shares of common stock at $50 per share, with an initial margin at 50%. The stock paid no dividends du
son4ous [18]

Answer:

40%

Explanation:

Initial amount invested  = $50 × 100 × 50% = $2,500

Profit from sale and repurchase = ($50 - $40) × 100 = $1,000

Rate of return = $1,000 ÷ $2,500 = 0.40, or 40%.

Therefor, the rate of return would be 40%.

4 0
3 years ago
Accounting does anyone know how to do a work sheet
aleksley [76]

Answer:

you can download it as a pdf document and then you can write on it, or you can print it out.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
In one hour, the United States can produce 25 tons of steel or 250 automobiles. In one hour,Japan can produce 30 tons of steel o
MArishka [77]

Answer:

Option (D) is correct.

Explanation:

In United states:

Can produce 25 tons of steel or 250 automobiles,

Opportunity cost of producing a ton of steel = 250 ÷ 25

                                                                          = 10 automobiles

Opportunity cost of producing 1 automobile = 25 ÷ 250

                                                                         = 0.1 tons of steel

In Japan:

Can produce 30 tons of steel or 275 automobiles,

Opportunity cost of producing a ton of steel = 275 ÷ 30

                                                                          = 9.17 automobiles

Opportunity cost of producing 1 automobile = 30 ÷ 275

                                                                         = 0.11

Therefore,

United States has a comparative advantage in producing automobiles because the opportunity cost of producing automobiles is lower than the Japan.

Japan has a comparative advantage in producing steel because the opportunity cost of producing steel is lower than the United states.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The matching principle, as applied to bad debts, requires:
    14·1 answer
  • When you retire 45 years from now, you want to have $1.25 million saved. You think you can earn an average of 7.6 percent on you
    13·1 answer
  • Ana is training for a triathlon, a timed race that combines swimming, biking, and running. Consider the following sentence: Ana
    15·1 answer
  • EB1.
    10·1 answer
  • To achieve and maintain physical fitness, exercise intensity should be ________ of the maximal heart rate.
    6·2 answers
  • The Fed's control over interest rates, quantitative easing, and direct lending to financial institutions are some of the tools o
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a benefit of a store channel shopping experience?
    14·1 answer
  • 1. The advantage of trade is a very important concept in economics. In examining trade between two individuals or two countries,
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement about natural resources is NOT true?
    12·2 answers
  • What company strategy correlates to returning the highest profit margins and return on assets?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!