If in fact, the salesperson did knowingly and willingly, after being asked to sell you a "model...that is safe to charge indoors", sold you a hoverboard which
catches afire while it is being charged
inside a building of some kind, to my knowledge, this most assuredly does breach the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, the aforementioned being upheld due to the fact that the product in question was only purchased because the buyer expressed a need for safety indoors to which, it was then "IMPLIED" by the aforementioned salesperson that this peice of merchandise was that which the customer was seeking. "Judgement for the plaintiff in the form of punitive damages and restitution in the amount of such and such, and so on and so forth, etc., etc..." Case Closed!!!
Answer: C. use 0.8 fewer units of capital.
Explanation:
The Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution (MRTS) shows how much you can decrease capital or labor by in order to keep production constant if you increase either capital or labor.
It is calculated by the formula:
= Marginal product of labor / Marginal product of capital
= 4 / 5
= 0.8
<em>The firm should use 0.8 fewer units of capital in order to maintain the same production level. </em>
I think that it is Miguel Cardona
Explanation:
I checked on the web
Answer:
The managing director has the nominal power but he is a paper tiger, and it is his assistant who actually runs the company.
I'm going to use A B C going down from "prevents detects(A).... to protects consumers(D)"
A-Dodd Frank Act
B-Patriot act
C-identity theft and assumptions
D-Credit card act