The European imperialism in Africa and Asia led to control over these areas and the people living in them by foreign forces. The Europeans were using the natural resources, controlled the economy, the society, used military power, and were occupying the high governing positions. On the other side, the native people were treated as lesser beings, often being stripped of their basic human rights, segregated in most things, and without any hope of prospering. This kind of situation led to the people of these areas that once were not in good relations to start uniting and acting together in order to get rid of the foreign rulers. Very quickly that led to the development of strong nationalist feelings and pride, which gradually was making the things harder and harder for the imperialists and the end result was the formation of modern day nations in Africa and Asia.
The statement is false.
Mapping of the Republic of Letters shows that Benjamin Franklin's correspondence, while he was in Europe, crossed the Atlantic more times than Voltaire's.
<h3>What was the significance of the Republic of Letters project?</h3>
The Republic of Letters is the long-distance intellectual community inside the late seventeenth and 18th centuries in Europe and the Americas. It fostered verbal exchange between the various intellectuals of the Age of Enlightenment or philosophes as they have been referred to in France.
Franklin's proposed alphabet protected seven letters to represent vowels. This set consisted of new letters, further to 5 letters from the present English alphabet: a, e, i, o, u. the first new letter was fashioned as a ligature of the letters o and a and used to represent the sound [ɔ] (as written in IPA).
Learn more about Republic of Letters here: brainly.com/question/16549706
#SPJ2
The Seven Years War (1756–63) was the first global war, fought in Europe, India, and America, and at sea. In North America, imperial rivals Britain and France struggled for supremacy.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no anexaste opciones o incisos, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
¿Consideras que la nueva ley de electoral promulgada por Piérola era discriminatoria?
Sí, era discriminatoria ya que la nueva ley electoral propuesta por Piérola hizo a un lado a los indígenas del Perú por ser analfabetos, por no saber leer ni escribir.
Cabe recordar que anteriormente, con la ley que se eliminó, los indígenas podían votar.
2- ¿Cómo favoreció esta ley a los intereses del estado civil?
Excluyendo la posibilidad de voto para algunas autoridades oficialistas y para los militares. De esta forma, se estaba protegiendo al actual gobierno de una posible injerencia militar y presión por parte del ejército.
La Ley Electoral fue promulgada el 20 de noviembre de 1896. Con esa ley se suprimía la anterior ley que se basaba en colegios electorales que se caracterizaban por elegir autoridades a través del llamado voto indirecto. Algo muy parecido al sistema electoral de los Estados Unidos.
