True Because they have preperations for your tests
Answer:
As in her worthless note,Sandy has a zero adjusted basis. Her bad debt deduction is Nil according to Section 166 (b).
Section 166(g)(1) states that her capital loss realized on the deemed sale of this stoke is also nil because of zero adjusted basis in her worthless stock.
According to Reg. Sec.1.1366-2(a)(5) if all of her stock is disposed by an S corporation shareholder and loss carryforward attributable to the Section 1366 (d) basis. Limitaitons are permanently disaalowed.
Hence, her $7,400 ordinary loss carryforward can never be deducted by Sandy.
Sandy has no 2012 tax consequences from worthlessness of her Lindlee investments
Assume the union freeman works with pays newer employees less than ones who have been with the organization for a longer time. The basis for this is: two tier contract.
<h3>What is two tier contract?</h3>
Two tier contract can be defined as the way in which employee who work in an organization does not earn the same wages as some employee earn higher wages that others while some earn lesser wages.
Hence, if newer employees earn lesser than those who have been with the organization for a longer time. The basis for this is called two tier contract.
Learn more about Two tier contract here:brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Answer: $197,600
Explanation: Don Co is making a sale to Cologne GmbH and on the date of the transaction there is an exchange rate called the spot rate. Don Co will record in its books the value of the transaction on the set date at the spot rate which is:
200,000 euros @ .988
= $197,600
on the date of the settlement of the debt by Cologne GmbH, the spot rate is also considered which will be 200,[email protected] .995 = $199,000
Note that on the payment date, the exchange rate has gone up and now Don Co has a higher receivable value that what is in its book.
the difference of $1,400 ($199,000-$197,600) will now be noted in the books of Don Co as an exchange gain on the transaction.
<span>Because the statute penalizes the person committing the crime as well as the employer whose employee committed the crime, Chris can be held liable, and the company that we works for (Watkins) can be held vicariously liable under the statute.</span>
