Answer:
B.Anecdotal Evidence
Explanation:
While reading a magazine article, the writer quotes example of Anecdotal experience as it is purely based on one's own individual experience and not describing the whole scenario.
A expirement hoped it helped
Answer:
to suggest and support an interpretation of literature
Explanation:
<em>to suggest and support an interpretation of literature</em> – <u>this is the correct answer. The literal analysis is careful reading and interpretation of the written piece.</u><u> The analysis should examine carefully characters, settings, atmosphere, imagery, and plot. </u>The full and scientific analysis should explore the meaning and the ideas behind the written piece, and use the literary theory that fits the work.
<em> to summarize a work of literature in great detail</em> – this is not the correct answer. Literary analysis is not just a summary of the piece.
<em />
<em> to evaluate how well a work of literature is written</em> – this is not the right answer. The analysis doesn’t grade up the quality of the piece.
<em />
<em> to suggest how a work of literature should be revised </em>– this is not the correct answer. Review or edit are the ones that suggest the revisions.
Answer:
3). Rods.
Explanation:
As per the question, NightHawk's ability to have an outstanding vision at night while deficient during daytime is due to 'large number of rods' in his eye as<em> these rods(being exclusively responsible for night vision) enable them to see at night due to being relatively more sensitive than the cones.</em><em> </em>NightHawk's day vision is poor as these rods are almost insensitive to color and they(rods) help in 'peripheral or indirect vision' not the 'central or direct vision'. Thus, <u>option 3</u> is the correct answer.
