1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lana71 [14]
2 years ago
5

How did economic differences between the North and the South lead to conflict?.

History
1 answer:
natta225 [31]2 years ago
7 0

The economic differences between the <em>North</em> and the <em>South</em> led to conflict due to the South's reliance on <u>agriculture</u> led to their dependence on <u>slave labor.</u>

<h3>What is the conflict between the North and the South?</h3>

The economic differences were the major reason that initiated the Civil war between the North and South.

The Nothern regions were more into manufacturing activities while South was dependent on agriculture-related to cotton.  

Therefore, the North experinced the industrial revolution but the South was still struggling with <em>slave labor</em> that <u>detorirated</u> their lifestyle.

Learn more about economic conflicts here:

brainly.com/question/9440615

You might be interested in
How did alexander graham bell contribute to the social, political and economic growth of us?
aliina [53]
Still need a answer it the post is 3 days old
3 0
3 years ago
Which is NOT a reason to
Masteriza [31]
I'm guessing B, (to punishment) :p
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast what you know about the current U.S. government with government outlined in the Articles of Confederation.
umka2103 [35]

Answer:

We will notice that even though they were written within a period of just over a decade and mostly by the same people, the differences are quite clear between them.

Explanation:

If we compare the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the U.S we would get a fair idea of the differences between them. The Articles were heavily criticized for centralizing all the powers in the hands of state governments and leaving the central government at their disposal. But this wasn't the only distinguishing point between these documents. The two distinguished in several ways such as the judiciary, power of levying taxes, the number of votes in Congress, etc.

5 0
3 years ago
What do the governments of Mexico and Denmark have in common?
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

The United States of Mexico is a federal presidential republic. The Constitution of 1917 is in force with numerous amendments. Executive power belongs to the president, who is the head of state and government. The President forms the cabinet, appoints and removes ministers, the Attorney General (with the approval of the Senate), members of the Supreme Court (with the approval of the Senate) and other senior public servants. The President determines domestic and foreign policy, has legislative initiative and veto power, establishes diplomatic relations and concludes international treaties. The president is elected by the people on the basis of universal, direct, secret ballot, without the right to re-election. Legislative power belongs to the bicameral National Congress. The principles of public administration in accordance with the 1917 Constitution meet the criteria for representative liberal democracy.

Denmark is a constitutional monarchy. The constitution was adopted in 1849; amendments were made in 1915 and 1953, when a unicameral parliament was created and women were allowed to become head of state. The head of state is the king, who exercises legislative power together with a unicameral parliament. The highest legislative body is Folketing. Executive power belongs to the monarch and is carried out on his behalf by the government. The government is appointed by the Prime Minister, approved by Folketing and is accountable to him.

Thus, the similarity is the fact that in Mexico the president and in Denmark the king determine domestic and foreign policy. However, the difference is obvious, primarily consisting in the very form of government - the republic and the monarchy, respectively, with all the further differences that follow from this.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
To whom did the first continental congress appeal in their declaration of America rights and grievances
Westkost [7]
It was to parliament
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these was the first Native American tribe in New Mexico?
    9·1 answer
  • During which empire was the Indian region divided into territories, controlled by officials, while regions that were conquered o
    7·1 answer
  • 2.10 Lesson Assessment: Federalism Pool 1
    14·1 answer
  • In the Fourth Party System, Democrats versus Republicans (GOP), which party was the “liberal” party in terms of wanting to use t
    12·1 answer
  • Why did the shah of Iran's government collapse in 1979?
    14·1 answer
  • Help plz plz thx thx
    11·1 answer
  • Why did some muslim empires practice religious tolorance
    14·1 answer
  • What do you think the Italian people found appealing about fascism​
    12·1 answer
  • All right, I need you to pick the answer with the underlined text that can be replaced by the word. Which is it?
    14·2 answers
  • What was Hunter Comitee?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!