1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Readme [11.4K]
2 years ago
10

A. The Chesapeake and New England regions had many differences in development, but they also had similarities.

History
1 answer:
Kisachek [45]2 years ago
3 0

A thesis statement that would not be acceptable is <u>B. The </u><u>Chesapeake </u><u>and </u><u>New England colonies </u><u>developed into</u><u> two distinct societies </u><u>based on their </u><u>geography</u><u>, </u><u>reasons </u><u>for </u><u>founding</u><u>, </u><u>economic </u><u>characteristics, and </u><u>relationships </u><u>with </u><u>American Indians.</u>

You did not include the prompt in the question but the above should be the best answer.

The New England Colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were different in that:

  • New England colonies were founded to escape religious persecution while the Chesapeake colonies were founded to make profit
  • New England colonies engaged in shipping, food production and lumbering whereas the Chesapeake colonies focused on tobacco.

Even though they were different in the above regard, their treatment of Native Americans was the same as they both started off with peaceful relations with the Natives which eventually deteriorated into war.

We can therefore conclude that even though they differed in several ways, they did not differ in Native treatment which would make option B wrong.

<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/18193023.</em>

You might be interested in
What was the most significant change Akhenaton made to the Egyptian religion?
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What events lead up to the slave trade compromise
Anna007 [38]

Essentially, it had to do with political power. Slave-holding states wanted to include slaves who were unable to cast ballots in their political representation in Congress. Non-slave states perceived this as a ruse to exert influence over the newly formed government. This topic has been covered in a lot of writing. Contrary to some who assert that shows how the founders thought about black people, they address the problem of political representation. Since they now had more representation in the halls of government than the non-slave states, many in the slave states viewed this as a victory. Most individuals who opposed slavery simply wanted to count the free people in a population, but those who supported it wanted to count slaves as well. As a result, slave owners would be represented in the Electoral College and the House of Representatives by a greater number of seats. Numerous ratios were taken into consideration, including three-fourths, half, and one-quarter. James Madison would propose the Three-Fifths Compromise after much discussion. The Three-Fifths Compromise was not accepted by all of the states, and the Articles of Confederation needed a unanimous vote. As a result, the Compromise was not ratified until the Constitutional Convention. The Three-Fifths Compromise would dramatically increase slave-owning states' political clout and representation. If the Southern states had been represented equally, 33 seats in the House of Representatives would have gone to them. However, as a result of the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Southern states did have 47 seats in the House of Representatives of the first American Congress in 1790. As a result, by accumulating enough political influence, the South would be able to take control of presidential elections.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the Star Wars? What were the consequences?
natta225 [31]

Answer:

A collection of awesome movies

Explanation: i dont know the consequences

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the presidents income? Who said his income. Why do you think they set the presidents income?
sertanlavr [38]
is there a little bit of more information
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following BEST explains who the Daughters of Liberty were and the role they played in the American Revolution?
olga2289 [7]

The correct answer is C) They were women who boycotted British goods, instead, producing the goods they needed at home.

The statement that BEST explains who the Daughters of Liberty were and the role they played in the American Revolution is "They were women who boycotted British goods, instead, producing the goods they needed at home."

All American colonists participated in the claim for liberty and independence. Men formed the Sons of Liberty. Women formed the Daughters of Liberty. This female group was formed to protest against heavy taxation from the British crown.  They were angry when the English imposed the Townshend Acts of 1767, that charged taxes for imports such as lead, tea, glass, and paper. They always supported the Patriotic cause.  

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement BEST describes the Bolshevik Revolution?
    14·2 answers
  • Which phrase completes the diagram​
    8·1 answer
  • In 1929, ongoing economic issues led to
    12·1 answer
  • What does this political cartoon suggest about
    10·2 answers
  • Where did the Trail of Tears begin?
    13·1 answer
  • True or False: The Land Law of 1851 caused many Mexican-Americans to lost their land in Califomia
    6·1 answer
  • Charlie gets in line to vote. It’s 1968 and he is 18 years old. When he gets to the front of the line, he is denied and told he
    12·1 answer
  • How did the war of 1812 end
    10·1 answer
  • What was the objective of state governments after the elections in 1868?
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement BEST describes how the government of ancient Rome influenced the United States?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!