Answer: We´ve studied a lot this week
Explanation:
Answer:
D. Jake tore up the main character's socks.
Explanation:
Well, all of the other answers do not make sense.
B does not make sense beacause Jake probably also eats other things and nothing in the passage says he only eats socks.
C does not make sense because nothing in the passage says Jake is the main chaecters brother.
A and D were probably the answers you were confused with.
A would kinda make sense but it is quite obvious that in the passage they do not focus on the fact that Jake brought the socks to the kitchen at all.
They focus on the fact Jake broke the sock.
So D would be a reasonable explanation and is basically the only one that makes sense.
That is my answer!
In the book thief, the inference is that Liesel and Rudy simply stole apples from an orchid.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information given in the story.
a. What do they steal?
It should be noted that the children stole apples from an orchid on the outskirts of town.
b. From whom did they steal?
They stole the apples from the mayor's house.
c. What do they do with the things they steal?
They ate the apples that they got from town. On the first day that they stole the apples, Liesel ate six apples in a row.
d. When do they feel bad about what they have stolen?
They felt bad about what they have stolen when they stomach upset and got sick.
In conclusion, it should be noted that both characters were important to convey the theme that was illustrated in the story.
Learn more about the book thief on:
brainly.com/question/14832927
#SPJ1
Ahcooiiiididididieieieiebbwbe djidis moooo butch in a cow
Most likely the correct answer among the choices listed above is option B. <span>Based on the Greek word pathos, most likely meaning of the word apathy is the absence of feeling. "pathos" means a quality representing emotions or feelings.</span>
