Answer:
The incremental cost per unit associated with the special order is $60.
Explanation:
Direct materials 20
Direct labor 10
Variable overhead 20
Variable selling and administrative 10
Total 60
Therefore, The incremental cost per unit associated with the special order is $60.
Answer:
Please see explanation
Explanation:
To answer the given question, first we will calculate the theoretical future price which shall be determined using continuous compounding formula as follows:
Theoretical future price=400*e^(10%-4%)*4/12
=$408.08
The actual future price of a contract deliverable in 4 months is only $405 which means that the index future price is too low in relation to the index.
The suitable arbitrage strategy shall be:
1. to purchase the future contracts
2.Short sale the shares which are underlying the index
Answer:
54,600
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
Particular Quantity of Raw Material (liters)
Required Raw Material 56,000
Add-Raw Material’s ending stock (52,000 × 35%) 18,200
Less-Raw Material’s opening stock(56,000 × 35%) 19,600
Budgeted material need for April 54,600
We simply applied the above format for determining the budgeted material needed for the month of April
Answer:
Roper Spring Water should not buy the machine, since it produces a negative net present.
Explanation:
Summary of Cash Flows on the Machine are as follows :
Year 0 = ($230,000)
Year 1 = $55,000
Year 2 = $65,000
Year 3 = $75,000
Year 4 = $75,000
Interest rate = 7%
Using the CFj Function of the Financial calculator this will be computed as :
($230,000) CF j 0
$55,000 CF j 1
$65,000 CF j 2
$75,000 CF j 3
$75,000 CF j 4
i/yr = 7%
Therefore Net Present Value is - $3,385.13
Since this is a negative Net Present Value, Roper Spring Water should not buy the machine.
Answer:
decreased by 20%
Explanation:
Supposed we have input price of $30,000 and it produced an output of 300 units on the first year of operation. The cost per unit on the first year is $100 each ($30,000/300).
On the second year we still have the same input expense of $30,000 but the productivity output increased by 25%. So we have 375 units produced on the second year’s operation. The new cost per unit would be $30,000/375=$80 per unit.
Therefore we conclude that based on the example given, the new unit cost per product decreases by 20%.
$100-80 = $20
$20/$100 = 20%
