Answer:
D. Fundamental analysis would now show the corporation is undervalued. The fact that the price was unchanged is not consistent with the efficient markets hypothesis.
Explanation:
Under factors of production, we have Land ,labour ,capital and entrepreneur.
Labour are the prime movers of a business.If a new CEO with a good track record has been employed, then the value of the company will increase.
Technically, that Quadrangle Company has increased its production(which might mean that the goods and services they deliver to their clients has increased or the mode of delivery of services has been improved upon), the value is also meant to increase.
With all these indices in place, fundamental analysis will now show that the corperation is undervalued. so D
Fundamental analysis would now show the corporation is undervalued. The fact that the price was unchanged is not consistent with the efficient markets hypothesis
perfectly fits the answer
The formula to calculate p/e ratio is: price/earnings.
So, the price of the stock would be
p/e ratio = price/earnings
18 = price / 2.4
Price= 2.4 x 18
Price = 43.2
If your income is $40,000 and your income tax liability is $5,000, your marginal tax rate is: b. 12.5 percent.
Using this formula
Marginal tax rat=Tax payable/Taxable income×100
Where:
Tax payable=$5,000
Taxable income=$40,000
Let plug in the formula
Marginal tax rate=$5,000/$40,000×100
Marginal tax rate=12.5%
Inconclusion if your income is $40,000 and your income tax liability is $5,000, your marginal tax rate is: b. 12.5 percent.
Learn more here:brainly.com/question/18488309
Answer:
a. $103,400
Explanation:
As we know that
Cost of goods sold = Beginning inventory + purchases - ending inventory
And,
Gross profit = Sales revenue - cost of goods sold
Since in the question it is given that
The ending inventory and beginning inventory had been overstated by $11,200 and $6,600 respectively
Since overstatement in the initial inventory raises the cost of the goods sold and decreases by that amount the gross profit & net income
And, overstatement in ending inventory reduced cost of goods sold and raised gross profit & net income by that amount.
So for overstated ending inventory the amount should be deducted and for overstated beginning inventory the condition would be reverse
So, the correct amount is
= incorrect pretax net income + overstatement in beginning inventory - overstatement in ending inventory
= $108,000 + $6,600 - $11,200
= $103,400
