Question

What did the Supreme Court decide in the case of Mapp v. Ohio? A. Police should inform suspects of their right to remain silent or have a lawyer present before taking their confession. B. If the police violate the law to obtain evidence , they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court. C. The government cannot prevent a newspaper from printing a story without proving that this would be a clear threat to national security D. State universities can consider race in their admissions policies, but they cannot establish a race-based quota system

Answer 1

In Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled B. If the police violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.

What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.

The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.

Thus, in Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled B. If the police violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.

Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791

#SPJ1