Answer:
He made a <u><em>terrible</em></u> decision.
Explanation:
By splitting the empire in two, the Barbarians easily collapsed Rome, which lead to the death of the Roman Empire. It also led to the rise of the Byzantine Empire and the Frankish Empire. Over all, it was a terrible decision that changed European, perhaps even world history entirely.
Answer:
Northward to germany, france, england, and the netherlands.
Explanation:
Answer:
The missionaries could have tried a more friendly approach with the natives, besides having tried to make alliances with the French.
Explanation:
The missions promoted by the Spanish in the east in Texas had as main objective to expel the French from the region, to convert natives and to make the place safe for the establishment of borders.
Although a few borders were established, the missions were not successful. The natives had friendly relations with the French, which meant that the Spanish missions were not strong enough to expel them. Furthermore, the missionaries' approach to the Indians was not accepted with friendliness, but it did establish a strong conflict between natives and Spaniards.
Answer: similarly to Lafayette or Mirabeau, Louis XVI believed in moderate way of doing this revolution. Neither Lafayette nor Mirabeau were republicans. Louis XVI was not republican. In contrast to Mirabeau or Lafayette Louis XVI was forced to call for General States (1789) because of problems with state budget (minister of finances Jacques Necker made him to make his made about it, there was no other way). Louis XVI was no republican
Explanation: Louis XVI has no free will already in 1789. He was also under the influence of much more radical right: 1) his wife Marie Antoinette (from Austrian dynasty of Habsburg), 2) his brothers : Louis de Provence, Charles d´Artois, 3) emigration (aristocracy that already during 1789, 1790 escaped to Rhineland, especially to Koblenz). When he tried to escape, he was caught with all his family in Varennes, and then executed (January 1793).
