The question doesn't really make sense, science cannot be debunked with facts because science aims to hypothesize, test, and draw conclusions based off evidence, which has told us what is factual and what is not for the entirety of out existence. How can science even be "wrong" in the way you are putting it? For science as a whole to be wrong would mean we couldn't distinguish reality from fantasy whatsoever. Science isn't wrong if it disproves or discredits someone's beliefs, it is just labeled as biased by the same people who have lived their whole lives believing in a God without ever stopping to think that they might be wrong.
We still think that direct exposure to filth/decay can give us diseases and it’s probably true.
Answer: The Spanish said the rafts were in the shape of the extended fingers of a hand. The large balsa logs, lashed together with henequen fiber, formed the main deck of a raft. Seawater passed freely between and over the logs making it very difficult for rafts to be swamped by heavy seas.
From the moment the first plane hit the North Tower, the immigration system in the United States was destined to change.
The attacks on September 11, 2001 certainly didn't start the country's immigration debate, but it did alter the course of the discussion.
Immigration was already a staple of the nightly news through the 1990s into the 2000s. After a series of free trade agreements realigned economies in Mexico and Central America, millions of migrants headed to northern Mexico and the U.S. looking for work.
"After 9/11, the Bush administration tried to see immigration enforcement as a way to fight terrorism," Burnham said. "And it's just not."
so the answer D
The answer to the question is false, but it was built to celebrate the centennial of the french revolution.
