Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
Answer:
Examples:
Indirect speech:
He promised to take me to the cinema.
They threatened to sue us.
She offered me help.
Direct speech:
“I´m sad”, he said.
Explanation:
Reporting verbs, such as advised, complained, threatened, and offered, show that we are quoting or paraphrasing someone´s words, for both direct and indirect speech.
Oknnnnnbbbbbbbb.jdndjndndndndndnd
It’s A, the narrator is being persuasive.
By playing on audiences' fears
