Answer:
I believe the answer is indirect, but I am not quite sure.
Explanation:
Answer:
In "The Rhetorical Situation," Lloyd Bitzer notes that rhetorical constraints are "made up of persons, events, objects, and relations which are part of the [rhetorical] situation because they have the power to constrain decision or action." Sources of constraint include "beliefs, attitudes, documents, facts, tradition, image, interests, motives and the like.
Explanation:
Hope this <em><u>Helped!</u></em> :D
Answer:
An essay is, generally, a piece of writing that gives the author's own argument, but the definition is vague, overlapping with those of a letter, a paper, an article, a pamphlet, and a short story. Essays have traditionally been sub-classified as formal and informal. Formal essays are characterized by "serious purpose, dignity, logical organization, length," whereas the informal essay is characterized by "the personal element (self-revelation, individual tastes and experiences, confidential manner), humor, graceful style, rambling structure, unconventionality or novelty of theme," etc.
I hope it's helpful!
It would be number threew
Answer:
I believe that institutional discrimination does not occur because people purposefully act in a discriminatory way.
Explanation:
Institutional discrimination is the term that refers to racist concepts, customs and norms that are highly rooted in society and people's thinking, which are promoted and carried out as something common and cultural. Institutional discrimination is a racist act, but the people who practice it, fail to realize that they are being discriminatory and do not have, in most cases, the discernment that they are being racist and are causing social imbalance. An example of this occurs when a leader of an institution organizes the place by separating people by racial groups. This leader did not intend to discriminate against anyone, but by separating social races he established that they should not be together, which promoted discrimination.
In this way, I believe that institutional discrimination is not done because people purposely want to act in a discriminatory way, but because they did small discriminatory acts, without intention.
