1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nana76 [90]
2 years ago
10

Hall, a divorced person and custodian of her 12-year-old child, filed her 2021 federal income tax return as head of a household.

She submitted the following information to the CPA who prepared her 2021 return: The divorce agreement, executed in 2016, provides for Hall to receive $3,000 per month, of which $600 is designated as child support. After the child reaches 18, the monthly payments are to be reduced to $2,400 and are to continue until remarriage or death. However, for the year 2021, Hall received a total of only $5,000 from her former husband. Hall paid an attorney $2,000 in 2021 in a suit to collect the alimony owed. In June 2017, Hall's mother gifted her 100 shares of a listed stock. The donor's basis for this stock, which she bought in 1985, was $4,000, and market value on the date of the gift was $3,000. Hall sold her stock in July 2017 for $3,500. The donor paid no gift tax.During 2017, Hall spent a total of $1,000 for state lottery tickets. Her lottery winnings in 2017 totaled $200.Hall earned a salary of $25,000 in 2017. Hall was not covered by any type of retirement plan, but contributed $2,000 to an IRA in 2017.In 2017, Hall sold an antique that she bought in 1995 to display in her home. Hall paid $800 for the antique and sold it for $1,400, using the proceeds to pay a court‐ordered judgment.Hall paid the following expenses in 2017 pertaining to the home that she owns: realty taxes, $3,400; mortgage interest, $7,000; casualty insurance, $490; assessment by city for construction of a sewer system, $910; interest of $1,000 on a personal, unsecured bank loan, the proceeds of which were used for home improvements. Hall does not rent out any portion of the home. Hall's $2,000 contribution to an IRA should be treated as
a. A deduction from adjusted gross income not subject to the 2% of adjusted gross income floor.
b. A deduction from adjusted gross income subject to the 2% of adjusted gross income floor.
c. An adjustment to income in arriving at adjusted gross income.
d. Non-deductible, with the interest income on the $2,000 to be deferred until withdrawal.
Business
1 answer:
Alekssandra [29.7K]2 years ago
8 0

The $2000  contribution to an IRA should be treated as an An adjustment to income in arriving at adjusted gross income.

<h3>The reason Hall has to go with this option</h3>

The individuals that are not in a retirement plan of a company have the option of deducting their cash contributions to their own retirement accounts.

They are able to do this given that the money is 6000 dollars or a hundred percent of their gross income.

Taxes are not paid on interest in this type of account till the earnings from the retirement plan is distributed.

Read more on deductibles here: brainly.com/question/5306277

You might be interested in
At Hodgson Corporation, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process and conversions costs are uniformly applied.
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

$2.25 per unit

Explanation:

The computation of the cost per equivalent is shown below:

= Total conversion cost ÷ total units completed

where,

Total conversion cost is

= Beginning work in process conversion cost + cost of conversion added

= $20,250 + 271,125

= 291,375

And, the number of units is

= Units completed + work in process ending inventory units × completion percentage

= 115,700 units + 23,000 units × 60%

= 115,700 + 13,800

= 129,500 units

So, the cost per equivalent unit for conversion cost is

= $291,375 ÷ 129,500 units

= $2.25 per unit

4 0
3 years ago
Sheffield Laboratories holds a valuable patent (No. 758-6002-1A) on a precipitator that prevents certain types of air pollution.
vlabodo [156]

Answer:

                        SHEFFIELD LABORATORY

                            PATENT (NO. 78-6002-1A)

Carrying value as at Dec 31

                                      2011                     2015                   2018

Cost                            $182,300           $349,000           $385,000

Amortization             <u> (10,724)   </u>             <u>(79,433)  </u>           <u>(142,403)</u>

                                 <u> 171,576     </u>         <u>   269,567  </u>           <u>242,597</u>

Cost

As at 31 Dec 2011

Design and construction of a prototype                                     $89,000

Testing of models                                                                           40,600

Fees paid engineers and lawyers to prepare application          <u> 52,700</u>

                                                                                                       <u>$182,300</u>

As at 31 Dec 2012

Cost as at Jan 1, 2012                                                                $182,300

Additional cost during the year:

Engineering activity necessary to advance.                           <u> $84,500  </u>

                                                                                                    <u>$266,800</u>

As at 31 Dec 2013

Cost as at Jan 1, 2013                                                                $266,800

Additional cost during the year:

legal fee paid                                                                              <u>$40600  </u>

                                                                                                 <u>   $307,400</u>

As at 31 Dec 2014

Cost as at Jan 1, 2013                                                                $307,400

Additional cost during the year:

Research aimed at modifying the design                                <u>$41,600 </u>

                                                                                                   <u> $349,000</u>

As at 31 Dec 2018

Cost as at Jan 1, 2018                                                                $349,000

Additional cost during the year:

legal fee paid in unseccesful patent infrigement.                   <u>  $36,000  </u>

                                                                                                    <u>$385,000</u>

Amortization for the year    

Dec 31 2011         $182,300/17 =  $10,724

Dec 31 2012

182,300/17                                          10,724

84,500/0                                          <u>      -       </u>

                                                         <u>  10,724</u>

<u />

Dec 31 , 2013 :

  $182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/0     =     <u>    -  </u>

                         <u>   16,005</u>

Dec 31 2014  =  

$182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/16     =       2,538

41,600/17      =       <u> 2,447</u>

                         <u>   20,990</u>

Dec 31 2018  =  

$182,300/17 =  $10,724            

  84,500/16    =      5,281

40,600/16     =       2,538

41,600/17      =        2,447

36,000/0     =    <u>       -</u>

                         <u>   20,990</u>

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Edmentum/Plato users help!!! Worth 50pts<br> &lt; Image Attached &gt;
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

A credit card

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Arnold is the director of an advertising firm. Being the MD, he has the potential or capacity to affect the behavior of his subo
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

The correct option is A

Explanation:

Arnold has the potential and capacity which means he has the power but instead he chooses to stick to important paperwork which makes him fail in influencing his subordinates.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
discuss the costs and benefits associated with statistical versus judgmental forecasts for labor supply. under what condition mi
patriot [66]

Answer:

The two methods used to forecasting labor demand and supply are: Statistical Method and Judgmental Method.

The Statistical method collects previous historic data regarding company's demand and supply for qualified employees and provides forecasting for the particular period. It is feasible when other factors remain same in the organisation. It is not feasible when the organisation changes its objectives, mission and vision etc

<u>Cost and Benefit</u>

It prevents future shortage of qualified employees

It avoids disruption over operation

The Judgmental method is when the company follow judgmental method, that is it is based on manager's experience of conducting survey to estimate employees requirements on future operation.

It is feasible for small and medium size organisation for short term forecast. It

<u>Cost and Benefit</u>

It avoids short-run shortage of employees

It avoids short-run surplus of employees.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ground-fault circuit interrupters must be used for all of the following except?
    11·1 answer
  • For biomedical engineers, what degree is generally required to teach in a university setting?
    13·2 answers
  • insider trading laws prevent employees from buying or selling the securities of their employers. true or false
    10·1 answer
  • Explain the tradeoffs that people may face when choosing a house or an apartment
    14·1 answer
  • This company reports only total factory overhead on the schedule of cost of goods manufactured and attaches a separate schedule
    9·1 answer
  • on its advertisement, a company claims that it has funds in its possession that are in fact not available for payment of losses
    8·1 answer
  • Ratios Calculated
    15·1 answer
  • A newly issued bond has a maturity of 10 years and pays a 7.7% coupon rate (with coupon payments coming once annually). The bond
    5·1 answer
  • WHy the world it doesnt let me get a account ON BRAINLY A FREE 7 DAY ONE IF YOU DONT FIX IT NOW OR BAD RATING AND ELIMINATION MY
    11·2 answers
  • P1 returns goods previously purchased on credit from P2.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!