Answer:
There are no answers to pick from!
Explanation:
The potential risks that these three groups fall into the same category is that it is a low percentage and it is not a realistic proposition.
According to the theory of 50, 20, 30, a person's salary should be divided into 3 buckets that are:
- 50% of salary must go towards mandatory expenses (housing rent payments, utilities, medical care, basic food, and transportation).
- 20% of the salary must be used for savings and debt payments (programmed savings for old age or a special event, or the payment of debts such as card payments, bank loans, among others).
- 30% of the salary must be allocated for non-priority expenses (it is the expenditure of money on experiences, objects, or others that are not essential for the individual).
This income distribution is unrealistic because most people spend more than 50% of their salary on compulsory expenses, reducing their economic capacity for other purposes.
In this way, the 20% destined to savings and payment of debts would be a minimum amount of the salary, which could have serious consequences such as:
- Inability to pay debts
- Inability to save for the future
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/12198015
Answer:
Marketing synergies
Explanation:
Marketing synergies refers to the combination of two or more marketing initiatives that produces an effect that is greater than the sum of the results of implementing each of them alone. Also, this helps to save money by combining the efforts. According to this, the answer is that this allows Apple to enjoy cost savings due to marketing synergies because the professional segment of medium/large businesses is interested in purchasing all of the items in the product line which allows to create synergies.
You mutiply the outside number by the 1st number on the inside of the paranthesis
