Answer:
A Communist government
Explanation:
A communist system of government is a type of government where the resources, properties, and wealth of the state are owned by the community instead of individuals. It is the opposite of democracy and capitalism. This style of government was proposed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Some countries that had practiced this style of government include; the Soviet Union, Japan, and China.
It is a classless society where individuals are not allowed to own properties. Today, the Communism practiced in China is not the ideal communism for there are some attributes of Capitalism present in it.
Answer: This policy was meant to be a pressure for China to become a democratic country and to make the U.S. be seen as an role model. It was an ideological battle that USA had to grant the propaganda was being made in the right way, so they would show the strenght of their policies in an economical and social way. The biggest disadvantage was not being able to participate on tradings with a country that was changing and growing so fast it was almost becoming the largest market in the world. Economically, the U.S. had to think again on their strategies or they would face a fierce rival.
This strategy was proven to be useless since USA opened up in the 1970's for trading with China again, and this country continues to develop its economy even having a communist government. The socialist market policy didn't lead to democracy as the U.S. thought. Having this in mind, in my opinion there's no point in mantaining this kind of thought that only shows the American dream is to conquer countries by imposing their way of thinking and considering only their point of view as the right thing to do.
They come from beliefs in voodoo magic and dark evil sacrifice rituals.
Answer:
They protect justices from political pressure.
Explanation:
The justices' main role is to evaluate laws and decide on cases between two or more parties according to the law. They hold hearings, discuss the cases and come to a conclusion. And in order to impartially carry this task, they are given lifetime appointments so that they do not feel pressured to gain people's vote when running for re-election and the pressure to determine cases based on what people would like. Instead, they are expected to decide cases objectively, according to the law.
