I feel that Hamilton's statements has some threshold, in reflection, to today's modern society. I believe that with the many diverse opinions, it seems as if it has weakened us a little more. Lets take for example, the TPP agreement, this stirred many controversy between the rich and the middle classed folks. It was like clashing between Left and Right wing...But that depends on your stance. Another example would be Trump's idea of building a wall. That idea may still be a thought, but the idea of actually building a wall to divide America and Mexico, stirred a lot of hate, and yet a lot of support from the general public. And there were even some who were in between. But regardless, the statement really depends on how clean (or non-biased) your eye lenses are.
I hope you understood that. Have any doubts, please say so. Chur! :)<span />
In one short, succinct statement Justice George Sutherland altered the relationship between Congress and the executive branch. “The President [operates] as the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations,” he wrote in the United States Supreme Court’s decision of U.S. v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation<span>. Whereas the Constitution lays out distinct, delegated powers to Congress, such as the power to declare war and the power to ratify treaties, and to the executive, primarily the role of the president as Commander-in-Chief, Justice Sutherland’s statement altered the relationship between the two aforementioned branches. Suddenly, the executive branch had a legal precedent with which to become the leading force in foreign policy and upon which it could fall back on if actions are legally challenged.</span>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "TRUE." Changes in immigration law have contributed to the recent increase of newcomers from Africa. This statement is true as far as the changes in the immigration is concerned.
Yes
Truman told Stalin that his diplomatic style was frank and to the point, an admission that Truman realized had visibly pleased Stalin. The US president said he hoped the Soviet Union would join the US in the war against Japan. For his part, Stalin wants to impose Soviet control over certain territories annexed by Germany and Japan at the beginning of the war.
Truman hinted that although Stalin's agenda was "dynamite" or aggressive, the US had ammunition to counteract the Soviet leader. Truman did not inform the Soviet Union head of state about the Manhattan Project that had just successfully tested the first atomic bomb, but he knew that the new weapon strengthened its deterrent power. Truman referred to this secret in his diary as "an unexploded dynamite."
Answer:
Option: McCarthy was a bully who browbeat witnesses and made sweeping accusations with no basis in fact.
Explanation:
Senator Joseph McCarthy began the period of McCarthyism in America during the 1940s and 1950s. During this period, many Americans arrested as Communist agents without precise evidence. During the McCarthy period, hundreds of Americans accused of being communists and questioning before the government. The fear of the Soviet Union led hundreds of Americans sent into prisons while thousands lost their positions in office. The prime targets of doubts were government employees. His hunt ended when he attacked several U.S. Army officers for having communist sentiments. Many accused him of being a tyrant who used power in a wicked way and never produced a proper document.