Jefferson's quote will be an example of propaganda if it influences the reader to agree with a statement, without using evidence, but using persuasive, sentimental, and manipulative elements.
<h3>What is propaganda?</h3>
- It is a form of persuasion.
- It is the ability to convince people to support opinions, beliefs, and precepts.
Propaganda is a way of manipulating the public to support a particular speaker. This speaker presents a statement, without showing logical evidence that proves why that statement is correct and reliable.
However, this speaker uses emotional, religious, psychological, or any other element capable of manipulating the audience dishonestly.
An example of this can be seen in a person who claims that vaccines cause disease because God did not show in the Holy Bible that people should be vaccinated. This person did not use scientific evidence to confirm his claim but used religious elements to manipulate a Christian audience into supporting him.
Unfortunately, you didn't show which Jefferson quote your question refers to. This left your question incomplete and it was not possible to find the complete version of it, which prevents me from providing an objective answer. However, I hope this information will help you find that answer.
Learn more about propaganda:
brainly.com/question/21860449
#SPJ1
Answer:
Barton W. stone, Alexander Campbell, and Richard Allen. Many participants were women because the second great awaking was focused on women's rights.
Answer:
I know that the united state did encourage women to do male jobs.
Explanation:
Nelson Mandela helped end apartheid, so A is incorrect. B would be right, but the white population is the minority in South Africa, not the majority. It ended in 1991, so C is not right. This leaves us with D, the correct answer. I hope this helps!
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
