1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sonbull [250]
2 years ago
12

Compare and contrast the roles of slaves and freemen in the Roman Republic.

History
1 answer:
Marizza181 [45]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

1. Roman slavery was not based on race so sometimes it was hard to differ if someone was a slave or not (everyone looked similar).

2. Both roles are pretty similar except for the fact that slaves are forced into labor work and freed men work on their own free will and are treated better.

3. Slaves are abused and treated badly and freemen aren't.

4. Slaves were used in all forms of work except for public office.

5. Often times employed men and slaves would work together except that the free employed men would get paid and the slaves wouldn't (this usually happened when one cannot find enough slaves to work and can only conclude to using paid workers so that's when they end up getting mixed together).

The role of slaves and freemen seem very similar in a lot of aspects (despite the fact that slaves cannot work in public office) but they are ranked by their parents (if your parents are slaves then you're born a slave) and slaves can also be chosen out of something like a battle. If they lose they are taken in as slaves. What I'm trying to say is that freedom was not a right but a privilege for people in the Roman Republic. Things like battles were used to justify and confirm superiority over the losers and gave the winners divine right to rule over the losers (slaves) and treat them badly. At a point the slaves were practically invisible.

Explanation:

ik know i already answer this one but can you give brainlist again

You might be interested in
How did the Missouri Compromise attempt to solve the debate over expanding slavery into new territories?
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

A. It outlawed the expansion of slavery west of the Mississippi river.

6 0
3 years ago
Are actors more able to connect to you from tv shows or movies ?<br>2 paragraphs ​
Amanda [17]

Answer:

I would say TV shows

Explanation:

  Yes i'm sure most people relate to movies but this is where it gets confusing. Now a Tv show is longer than a movie and continues more longer but it can teach a subject more than a movie such as friendship and responsibilities more than a 2 hour movie.                                                            From personal experiences i learned more from Rugrats than Rugrats The Movie (i know it probably isn't called that) so it goes more in details than it looks, but i do say that from MY experience not yours since everyone is different.

3 0
3 years ago
Which best describes the bush doctrine of preemption ?
Bond [772]
Bush's Doctrine of Preemption was a foreign policy approach anchored on a unilateral approach to protecting the best interests of the United States. President Bush <span>Bush took an oath to defend the United States from all enemies, both foreign and domestic. Consequently, he adopted a unilateral approach in accomplishing these.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
This was the union strategy to instigate a complete naval blockade of the confederacy in order to prevent the export of their ma
AysviL [449]

This is known as the Anaconda Plan.

This military strategy, developed by Union General Winfield Scott, was meant to starve the Confederacy out of their resources. Essentially, Scott felt that if the Confederacy could not trade for goods with other countries they would not be able to survive. This is due to the Confederacy's reliance on cotton as their main cash crop.

This strategy helps to explain why the US wanted to blockade trade with other countries as well as why the Union wanted to control the Mississippi River, as they knew control of this waterway could negatively impact the Confederacy's ability to transport/obtain resources.

8 0
3 years ago
What was the ruling the US Supreme Court made that ended the legal challenges to the presidential election of 2000
iris [78.8K]

The correct answer is Bush v. Gore.

In Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court ended legal challenges to the 2000 Presidential election.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • By 1914, which of the following African countries were still independent?
    15·1 answer
  • What were the political consequences of the revolution religion during the mid 1700s
    9·1 answer
  • What is the main idea of Carroll v. United States? Why is that idea important to the DLK case?
    8·1 answer
  • What do the boundaries of ancient Israel tell about its size compared with that of ancient Egypt with that of ancient kush?
    5·2 answers
  • Small fragments of orbiting bodies that have landed on the surface of Earth are known as
    14·1 answer
  • While the _____ proclaimed freedom from slavery, it set no standard for treatment, nor did it promise a life void of the judgmen
    8·2 answers
  • layunin ng ahensyang ito na tiyakin ang kaligtasan ng mga manggagawa pilipino sa pamamagitan ng pagpapatupad ng ibat ibang mga p
    12·1 answer
  • This list describes a key figure in the American Revolution.
    10·2 answers
  • Who were Las Gorras Biancas?
    5·1 answer
  • What did brown v. board of education challenge?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!