Biblical commentators believe the Books of Kings was written to provide a theological explanation for the destruction of the Kingdom of Judah by Babylon in c. 586 BCE and to provide a foundation for a return from Babylonian exile.
Strict constructionists interpret constitutional statements strictly. That means they want the words of the constitution to be put into practice with close attention to the original intent of the constitutional protections that were put in place. Since the 14th Amendment calls for "equal protection of the laws" for all citizens in respect to all their rights as citizens, Brown v. Board applied this to education and insisted equal rights could not be abridged or infringed upon in regard to educational facilities in any state of the Union.
<em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka</em>, decided by the US Supreme Court in 1954, ruled that all Americans are entitled to the same civil liberties and protections in regard to access to education. Until that decision, it was legal to segregate schools according to race, so that black students could not attend the same schools as white students. An older Supreme Court decision, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>(1896), had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality. In the case of <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, that standard was challenged and defeated. Segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.
The 14th Amendment was being violated by states whose laws supported the segregation of schools. The full context of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment reads as follows:
- <em>All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.</em>
The northwest was when Indians took over the winnapisake river and ate a raccoon
A shared proposal by Lincoln and Johnson regarding the reconstruction plan was the exclusion of ex-Confederate officers during the Civil War.
<h3>What was the Reconstruction period?</h3>
The reconstruction period was the duration from the year 1865 to the year 1877 pertaining to reconstructing the US country after the end of the Civil war.
- The reconstruction plan developed by Lincoln comprised of the oath taken to the union by the 10% of former confederate officers, the establishment of constitutions for new emerging states, and providing ex-confederate soldiers to be forgiven for the actions and misdeeds in the times of Civil war.
- The reconstruction plan of Andrew Johnson consisted of abolishing the slavery system in the South and allowing the southerners to adopt freedom and promised to the Union in paying their debts. These were the additions to the plan devised by Lincoln.
Therefore, the explanation provided in option B is the right answer.
Learn more about the Reconstruction period in the related link:
brainly.com/question/19158215
#SPJ1
The answer would be, because liberalism seeks the equalization of social stance, power, food, and other basic necessities.
