An enslaved person could not become free by traveling to a free state or territory was not a ruling of Scott v. Sanford.
Option: A
Explanation:
In 1868, the Fourteenth amendment protest the present decision and made a new decision over the Dred Scott decision by providing citizenship to all those who born in America regardless of racial and ethnic and colour variation.
It was a very important decision in the the then United States court about slavery system. When Emerson died in 1846 Scott referred master's widow for the rest of the movement as they lived freely in the territory. This decision was challenged by Missouri's Supreme Court. Court said Scott is still a slave so he has no right to take any decision.
Answer:
he was criticized for being ignorant.
Explanation:
In the story of Oedipus he was given a prophecy saying that he would kill his father and marry his mother. And in the end of the story he does end up killing his father and marrying his mother. This is foreshadowing, a clue or event that has happened before that tells of an event that will happen in the future.
It’s D. They both have different goods, so they can both benefit of each other
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson<span> on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to </span>grant<span> unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy</span>
