Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": harmonization.
Explanation:
In economics, convergence refers to the fact that poor countries' income per capita increases at a faster pace than in rich countries. At a certain point in time, every country's income per capita should converge at the same point.
Several actions could be carried out to fasten that process such as standardizing labor conditions across the European Community (EC) or free-trade blocks such as the North American Free-Trade Agreement (NAFTA). <em>Once labor conditions have been subject to </em><u><em>harmonization</em></u><em> regardless of the region in the world, convergence will be a more attainable objective.</em>
Call up the credit card company and have them look into it
Answer:
e. the power of buyers is low and barriers to entry are high.
Explanation:
- The cost leadership is the establishing a competitive advantage by having the lowest cost of operations and cost leadership is often driven by the company efficiency in size and sales. And the cumulative expand has a well-defined scope and the economies have chosen strategist and consists of the simultaneous cost leaderships example as Walmart and is different from the price leadership.
The available options are the following:
-Board members serve on multiple boards
-People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information
-Less frequent board meetings
-Better decisions about important issues
Answer:
-People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information
Explanation:
Considering the available options, the option that appears negative and related to the point being discussed is
"People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information."
It is straightforward, as changing the board of directors will at some point lead to a time where the new member in the board of directors will just be a competent worker but has no history with the company.
Answer:
Should Marston Manufacturing Company accept or reject the project?
Marston C Company should reject the project because its expected return is lower than Division H's cost of capital.
Since the divisions' risk is so different, and probably their projects are also very different, the company should use different costs of capital to accept of reject the projects based on each division's cost of capital.
Imagine another situation where Division L is evaluating a project that yields 10%. If they used the company's WACC, then they should reject the project, but if they used the division's cost of capital, then they should accept the project (in this case I would recommend accepting it).
Explanation:
Division H's risk = 14%
Division L's risk = 8%
WACC = 11%
