1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pavel [41]
2 years ago
8

In the context of the story the monkeys

English
1 answer:
Vesna [10]2 years ago
5 0

Taking the context of "The Monkey's Paw" into consideration, we can answer in the following manner:

1. According to the story, families may have a hard time facing the death of a family member. When someone dies, everyone suffers. <u>Some, however, may accept the event better than others.</u>

<u />

2. It is better to accept death when there is nothing one can do about it, when the person is already gone. It is better to fight death when the person is still alive, perhaps struggling with some illness. Then, it is good to fight, get treatment, deal with the problem.

3. Each approach has a different impact on people. If a family member dies and the others do not accept it, <u>they will not be able to move on and heal from the trauma</u>. That will certainly take a toll on their mental and physical health.

Accepting death may be better for those who are alive. They are better equipped to deal with reality and to move on.

  • "The Monkey's Paw" is a short story by W. W. Jacobs.
  • A mummified<u> monkey's paw</u> is brought into the Whites' home. It is <u>magical and can grant three wishes</u>.
  • The Whites are warned, however, that they should not use the paw. That <u>bad things happen to those who use it</u>.
  • They use it anyway, and the first wish results in the death of their son.
  • Mrs. White is unable to accept her son's death and makes her husband wish for their son's return.
  • Mr. White makes the wish, and it seems to have worked. However, their son died in an awful manner, and his body was greatly harmed.
  • Mr. White ends up wishing for his son to go away again.
  • The story shows that accepting death is probably better for those who are still alive.
  • Clinging to the past and to the memory of the person who died can have an <u>emotional and psychological impact</u> on those who are still here.

Learn more about the topic here:

brainly.com/question/20177631?referrer=searchResults

brainly.com/question/4801344?referrer=searchResults

You might be interested in
In a well-developed paragraph, explain why Shakespeare had King Duncan and Lady Macbeth first meet outside the castle at Inverne
grin007 [14]

Answer:

King Duncan visit's Macbeth's castle as a sign of respect of what Macbeth has accomplished for Scotland and for him.Lady Macbeth knows exactly how to respond. She humbles herself in front of the King, and says, ''All our service in every point twice done, and then done double, Were poor and single business to contend Against those honours deep and broad wherewith Your majesty loads our house.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How does the author introduce and describe the story’s characters in “how the animals lost their tails and got them back traveli
Afina-wow [57]

In "How the Animals Lost Their Tails and Got Them Back Traveling From Philadelphia to Medicine Hat" by Carl Sandburg, the main characters are animals and they are introduced in a comical manner. Sandburg uses literary devices; onomatopoeia, alliteration, and repetition.  

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
25points
Darya [45]

I think the answer is A)He combines details and indisputable facts with hyperbole and understatement to demonstrate the complexities of attempting to unify forces in order to promote change among opposing groups of citizens.

 but I am not 100% sure since I have not read "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" in a couple of years.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the author’s argument in the essay "Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaurs?”
Annette [7]

Answer:

The author's main argument in his essay was to tell how to develop scientific claims reaching to it's final conclusion rather than fascinating claims.

Explanation:

'Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaurs' is an essay written by Stephen Jay Gould, a Professor of Geology at Harvard University.

In his essay he explains how dinosaurs extinction took place by elaborating the three elements– sex, drugs, and disaster. By detailing each and every aspects, Gould presents how a good scientific proposal is elaborated. He starts his essay by defining science and how conclusions are reached through series of consequences and not by fascination. Then he goes on the explain his points and reaching the conclusion of his thesis.

Therefore, the main argument by Gould in this essay was to educate his readers how to develop scientific claims reaching to it's final conclusion rather than fascinating claims.

4 0
3 years ago
How to use the word acrimonious as a sentence
harina [27]

Answer:

We need to defuse this increasingly acrimonious situation

Explanation:

hope it helps you!!!

please mark as brainliest

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the adjective in the sentence. It has long, cold winters
    14·2 answers
  • What vowel sound is heard in this ie word? brief
    13·1 answer
  • Which word best replaces "the rod" in the context of this biblical proverb? He who spares the rod hates his son, but he who love
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these is an example of a video about black holes?
    6·2 answers
  • I need help plzplz<br> plz
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these statements about family relationships is true on Colonel Lloyd’s plantation?
    10·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 30
    12·1 answer
  • An explicit detail is a
    9·2 answers
  • What the first president of the united kingdom​
    11·1 answer
  • In The Last Curiosity How are the details in paragraphs 4-5 important to the development of the story? A They describe how curio
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!