1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yakvenalex [24]
2 years ago
8

What is implied when Chief Seattle compared the Europeans to grass while he called Native American, “a scattering of trees?

English
1 answer:
Karolina [17]2 years ago
4 0

At the time Chief Seattle, who was a recognized native chief of the northwestern United States, compared the Europeans to grass while he called Native American a scattering of trees, this analogy refers to both a positive and a negative face regarding his vision of both groups.

Thus, on the one hand, he considered the natives as trees, these being stronger, imposing and valuable than simple grass; but these were far from each other, in a small quantity, while the grass as such was uniform throughout the land.

In this way, Chief Seattle implied that he recognized the value of the native peoples in the face of the white advance, but that he understood that given the dispersal of the natives, the white control of the territory was inevitable.

Learn more in brainly.com/question/1603670

You might be interested in
What figure of speech is, Cindy is a fish when she swims
Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

Metaphor

Explanation:

Describing something else without like or as

Hope it Helps

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following should you do to make your argument effective? Compare the opposite side's views to something unpleasant.
vichka [17]

When you're arguing you want to make your point as objective as possible, for this you have to be impartial so that your proof is strong.

Comparing the opposite side's views to something unpleasant is useless since this kind of comparison holds no proof that your argument is true.  <em>Incorrect</em>

If you include only general details the audience will understand, you might not be able to communicate the specific points of your argument, therefore you wouldn't be able to prove it is accurate.  <em>Incorrect</em>

To make your argument effective you have to use specific details to refute the opposite side's views. That way you'll present the specific points in which your argument will stand, you will communicate logical and objective ideas about your argument and they will work to prove it.  <u><em>Correct</em></u>

If you appeal to emotion, your argument will be subject to possible biases since the way a person or group feels towards something doesn't prove it right or wrong. <em>Incorrect</em>

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does Alexie mean when he describes "an Indian boy" who "grows into a man who often
s2008m [1.1K]

What Alexie means when he describes “an Indian boy” who “grows into a man who often speaks of his childhood in the third-person” in paragraph 5 is; His childhood was painful to him, because as a student growing up he was always different for going up against the stereotype.

<h3>What does the word describe?</h3>

This question is taken from Sherman Alexie's story titled 'Superman And Me".

In the narrative essay titled “Superman and Me,” the author discusses how literature played a big role in his life growing up as an Indian boy, and the power it wielded in life.

The purpose of the author was to force his audience to understand his view of inequality. He utilized an emotional and analytic tone in order to translate to his audience of society as a whole his beliefs surrounding inequality and the power of reading and writing.

Alexie began the write up with an introduction paragraph that appealed to ethos along with pathos through the description of how he and his family grew up and lived on the Spokane Indian Reservation. He describes how his family “were poor by most standards,” but how they were normally better off than others.

Looking at the derivations above from the story, we can conclude that What Alexie means when he describes “an Indian boy” who “grows into a man who often speaks of his childhood in the third-person” in paragraph 5 is; His childhood was painful to him, because as a student growing up he was always different for going up against the stereotype.

Read more about Word meaning at; brainly.com/question/25071684

#SPJ1

3 0
1 year ago
What do lines 21-24 in Passage 1 reveal about the mother?
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

"she would take pity on our pleading faces and let us stay home"

5 0
2 years ago
Where are the boys going at the end of the chapter in the outsiders
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

to an abandoned church

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • URGENT Sofia is writing a research paper. What is the best plan for her to follow?
    14·2 answers
  • One word in this list doesn't belong to the same group: receiver, reviver, racecar, radar.
    9·1 answer
  • Briony was so elegant; it was like watching a crane diving into the water to snatch a fish. Briony and Evelyn worked together fo
    12·1 answer
  • "There is a sympathy that will make me conscious of him. I shall see him tremble. I shall feel myself shudder, suddenly and unaw
    12·1 answer
  • What evidence from the speech best shows how students can prepare themselves for
    6·2 answers
  • 50 POINTS In your journal, complete a PASAFE + TEAR paragraph analyzing the student writer's use of refutation to build his/her
    8·1 answer
  • (one word answer) - one who studies about boxes​
    10·1 answer
  • EXERCISE 2: COMPLETE THE SECOND SENTENCE SO THAT IT HAS
    11·1 answer
  • 20. Which is a simile?
    11·1 answer
  • critics widely recognized that each story within james joyce’s dubliners contains a theme of paralysis. in fact, joyce himself w
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!