Answer:
Answer E: undermine the traditional basis of a claim about conventional medicine’s legitimacy
Explanation:
Correct. The author discusses Eddy’s study in the context of elaborating on the question she asked in the fourth paragraph, “But how scientific is conventional ‘scientific’ medicine anyway?” This question challenges the perspective on conventional medicine described in the first paragraph, which sees conventional medicine as “scientific” and alternative medicine as “pseudoscience.” Since Eddy’s study concluded that conventional medical decision making was not based on strong scientific evidence, it provides evidence that refutes the traditional argument for the legitimacy of conventional medicine.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
<u>An Informative speech is the speech that gives an insight on a particular topic. This type of speeches educate its audience. informative speeches are helpful to provide education to the audience on the topic which they are completely unaware of. </u>
Jerome's presentation of his informative speech is ethical because he had cited his sources and he had used these sources to develop his ideas on the topic.
If he would not have cited the sources then he would have been guilty of plagiarism.
So, the correct answer is option A.
Answer:
D) Works Cited
Explanation:
-Citations are always in the last page for reference.
Hard to judge without the context of the other sentences of the story but if I had to guess, it sounds "inviting and familiar" to me.
