Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
The theorist Sigmund Freud proposed that anger originated toward a love object, but was ultimately turned inward against the self. He referred to depression as anger turned inward and said that “anger leads to fear, fear leads to hate, and hate leads to the dark side”.
Answer:
In the image it looks like it is showing that blue shirt is inviting yellow shirt to an activity but, yellow shirt does not like the idea.
Explanation:
blue shirts posture is like convincing yellow shirt .Yellow shirts facial expression is not happy so we can tell he is not with the idea. Yellow shirts poture is tight and stiff showing that he will not move and is refusing blue shirts suggestion.Blueshirts facial expression in not giving up to try to convince yellow shirt.The red background sets the mood of anger or refusal.
I would say “He went to a masquerade every night, made kites out of five-pound notes, and threw pieces of gold into the sea instead of stones, making ducks and drakes of them.”
shows that he is oblivious and irresponsible, squandering his money freely and literally throwing it away. It is until he ends up with nothing and no one, does he truly understand how lucky he was. (I don’t know if this is more of a there’s only one answer or it doesn’t matter as long as you support it question but I think it’s the best for the statement:)
