I agree with these perspectives on the grounds that there are a few situations where an individual planned to follow up on a good aim however the result wasn't right and here and there an individual expect to act awful after something and the activity ended up being great. My point is that occasionally unexpected things can happen and cause a change to a condition that we have no power in. I trust that an individual ought to be judged in light of their expectations, not their activities.
Answer:
Both
Explanation:
In view of the political and administrative positions that the US Constitution proposed and stabilized, it would be impossible to state that the choices made by the authors of the constitution were based on only one of the concepts mentioned in the question above. The constitution was written taking into account the republicanist ideas that guided the whole principle of the political structure imposed in the country. In addition, the principles of freedom, equality and natural rights were also used to define the socioeconomic relations that the government should maintain and stimulate the American territory.
Nevertheless, the government needed to establish guidelines based solely on the political interests that the authors had, even the definition of slavery within the country underscores those interests, aimed at the economy and agricultural production.
Question 9 is : hieroglyphics
Answer:
widespread ethnic conflict, lack of national identity
Explanation:
A lot of effect can be derived from the Europeans creation of colonial boundaries. Because the boundaries were artificially made, they by and large do not conform to “typical demographic, topographic and ethnographic boundaries.” Instead, they were created by colonialists who saw the act as a means to advance their political goals.
This metamorphosed into large scale issues, like the separation of ethnic groups; and other small scale issues, like families’ homes being alienated from their farms.
1. Doric
2. Ionic
3. Corinthian
