Answer:
C. Cities were not able to control businesses.
Explanation:
The Slaughterhouse Cases was as a result of an 1869 Louisiana legislation that granted the monopoly of the slaughtering business to one corporation, which led to a court suit by other slaughterhouses that said that such legislation infringed on their privileges as American businessmen.
The case was lost by a five-to-four majority stating that states retained jurisdiction over citizens and federal rights did not extend to the property rights of the aggrieved.
The problem that this brought was that cities were not able to control businesses.
Answer:
Poaching for money, not for the pot, was the problem. Gangs of men who descended on an estate to take large amounts of game to sell. It started in the 18th century, then grew into almost a class war in the 19th. ... The poachers were not paid as much, but they might still get a shilling or so per pheasant
Explanation:
The 17th century saw the government introduce import duties on a range of goods. Smugglers brought goods into a country without paying these duties and so could sell them at a cheaper price compared to traders who had paid the duty. As more and more goods were taxed in the 18th century, smuggling activity increased as people wanted greater access to cheaper goods.
Smuggling further developed with the introduction of larger smuggling gangs, such as the Hawkhurst Gang in Kent who operated on a far greater scale than previous smugglers. The leaders of this gang were caught and hung, however the authorities found it hard to tackle the crime of smuggling.
This was because smuggling was a social crime- people benefitted from the cheaper goods smuggled and so did not see it as wrongdoing, they even viewed smugglers as heroes in some areas. As a result, local communities would help to conceal smugglers rather than report them.
Smuggling was only really tackled by prime minister William Pitt, who lowered import duties in the 1780s, making prices of legally traded goods more competitive with the smugglers who were breaking the law. This meant that the extent of smuggling dropped dramatically
Answer:
By the time the British arrived at the North Bridge, a force of almost 400 colonial militiamen from Concord and the surrounding area had gathered on the high ground across the Concord River. The Minute Men formed up and advanced on the British, who responded by retreating back across the bridge and taking up a defensive position. When the British troops opened fire, the Minute Men responded with a volley of their own, killing three British soldiers and wounding nine others. The British troops fell back to the town.
The British, realizing their vulnerability, decided to return to Boston. Their retreat turned into a rout, however, as thousands of militiamen attacked the British column from all sides. Shooting from behind trees, rocks, and buildings, the Patriots inflicted heavy casualties on the retreating Redcoats.
By the time the fighting stopped, the British had lost 73 men killed and many more wounded, compared to the Patriots’ loss of 49 men killed.
Explanation:
To me, as a third-year law student, the correct approach is "living document."
The number one reason for this is that the Constitution was written in the late 1700s. The framers could not have envisioned, let alone written, a document that considered a world with the internet, access to space, etc.
So, our choices are either to have a new Constitutional convention OR adapt the current document.
I choose the latter.
