Answer:
What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?
Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.
What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?
The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.
Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.
A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.
Answer:
D. the Union honoring tribal treaties signed with the Confederacy
Explanation:
In The tribal treaties, the confederacy promised to not disturbed the Native's land in exchange for their help during the Civil War.
After the civil war ended, the Union decided no to honor these treaties and forced a lot of tribes to migrated out of their ancestral land.
The union wanted to used the land to provide enough space for railroads development. They wanted a fast method of distribution to deliver products from southern states to mid-norther states.
In order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure
domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the
general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and
our posterity, do ordain and establish constitution t refers to the fairness of the distribution of benefits and burdens among persons or groups in society. It may be such things as pay for
work or the right to speak or vote. They may include almost anything
that can be distributed among a group of people that would be considered
useful or desirable, such as praise, awards, opportunities for
education, jobs, membership in organizations, or money.
hope it helps
The correct answer to the according question is A) The power of kings and queens was limited.
The answer is C because the anti fedarlist did want the Bill of Rights to give federalist too mich power so that way they wouldnt end to corruption and they wanted to make sure that just they were safe from tryanny of the Central Government
