1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yan [13]
2 years ago
6

Which role did the Supreme Court play in the 2000 presidential election?

History
1 answer:
kaheart [24]2 years ago
4 0

The role that the Supreme Court played in the 2000 presidential election is D. It ruled that the recount of votes in Florida must proceed.

<h3>What is a Supreme Court?</h3>

It should be noted that the Supreme Court is the highest court in a nation.

In this case, the role that the Supreme Court played in the 2000 presidential election is that it ruled that the recount of votes in Florida must proceed.

Learn more about Supreme Court on:

brainly.com/question/519796

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What is the name of the dance that begins with "Sones camperos" performed by a group of huapangueros?
pickupchik [31]
I think the answer is (A)
3 0
3 years ago
Which of these leaders is most similar to the British leader Queen Victoria during the industrial revolution
oksano4ka [1.4K]
A restriction on the kinds of jobs a high schooler is allowed to have. In the past, queen victoria also imposed a same policy regarding underage workers.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a democratic Republic?
valina [46]
A democratic republic is strictly speaking a country that is both a republic and a democracy. it is one where ultimately authority and power is derived from the citizens and the government itself is run through elected officials.
7 0
3 years ago
Can someone plz help me? :(
lana66690 [7]
The correct answer is C
6 0
2 years ago
The supreme court ruled in bureau v. mcdowell that _____________ apply/applies only to the actions of government agents and not
Gnoma [55]
Unlawful search and seizure, the Supreme Court Ruling found that incriminating materials given to government representatives by private citizens or employees do not have the same rules regarding lawful search and seizure. For example, if someone provides incriminating documents that were procured without a search warrant and that someone is a private citizen, these documents are admissible in court and not subject to the same search and seizure laws as if they were being collected by a police officer. 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • what was the name given to the widespread fear of suspected Communists and radicals in the United States after World War 1?
    8·1 answer
  • What officially started the American Revolution A) the battle at Concord between the French navy and American soldiers. B) the B
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following shows the influence of the U.S. Constitution on the Texas Constitution?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following was the cause of the United States and Great Britain Berlin aircraft
    12·2 answers
  • Some historians have characterized the industrial leaders of the1805-1900 period as “robber barons,” who used extreme methods to
    10·1 answer
  • Two types of innovation s Europeans borrowed from other cultures
    13·1 answer
  • What is the location of the Byzantine empire?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did Canada join World War ||
    10·1 answer
  • HELP A GIRL ASAP PLEASE
    15·1 answer
  • What did Congress do to make sure the army had enough soldiers to fight?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!