Answer:
The Court upheld the statute only in the case of states that could provide matching funds; and if matching funds could not be provided.
Explanation:
The case was resolved 7-2 with the majority vote wrote by the Chief Justice William Rehnquist. It stated that the statue was a valid interpretation of the Spending Clause and that it was not unconstitutional. Congress has the authority of regulating the spends but not till the point they applied coercion.
I hope this answer helps you.
Two cons provides justice to survivors of morder victims and allows more resources to be invested into solving other murders and preventing violence
Deter and minimize crimes committed by minors
Brings justice to the victims
Answer:
Liberty in this context means "freedom". The freedom to do what you like (without breaking the law). Justice is an important hallmark of our democracy. Justice implies that whosoever is charged gets equal treatment from all members of society. It also implies that you're innocent until proven guilty, and are guaranteed due process (states must respect the rights of all individuals) and deliver impartial treatment. This leads to equal rights under the Constitution.
There is a good reflection of these three core ideals when you decide what career you want to take. Also, what religion, if any, you choose to practice. Moreover, the freedom of speech allows you to speak about your political affiliation without getting censored or even killed (compared to other systems of government). Finally, if you get a ticket, and did not commit a violation, then you are allowed to uphold your rights and are presumed innocent every step of the way.
Explanation:
I hope this helps. Tweak it a bit, to fit your style.
Answer:
not allowed by the constitution of a country or government; not constitutional.
