Answer:
b all request for extra neighborhood patrols
Vandalism ???? I think. Lol
It was not a ‘British’ reaction - there was divided opinion in Britain as to how to respond and even in Parliament there were some who were in sympathy with the growing colonial resistance to British taxes. The Prime Minister was not one of them. The Stamp Act was an attempt to recover some of the great cost that the French and Indian War had incurred. The Intolerable Acts were a response to the resistance that the Stamp Act had met with. The Stamp Acts was a tax intended to revenue. The intolerable Acts were intended to curtail the growing resistance- by the time of the Intolerable Acts legislation was no longer focused on raising revenue but was focused on the resistance that trying to raise revenue had met with
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
This is not a bribe as they are not asking for you to vote in their favor. You can take it without feeling guilty as they know that this could be highly illegal if they try and sway you over.
Answer:
Explanation:
the power to commission officers, as applied in practice, does not mean that the President is under constitutional obligation to commission those whose appointments have reached that stage, but merely that it is he and no one else who has the power to commission them, and that he may do so at his discretion. Under the doctrine of Marbury v. Madison, the sealing and delivery of the commission is a purely ministerial act which has been lodged by statute with the Secretary of State, and which may be compelled by mandamus unless the appointee has been in the meantime validly removed. By an opinion of the Attorney General many years later, however, the President, even after he has signed a commission, still has a locus poenitentiae and may withhold it; nor is the appointee in office till he has this commission. This is probably the correct doctrine.