Okay. The question is m/9 - 17 = 21. First off, we will add 17 to both sides. -17 + 17 cancels out. 21 + 17 is 38. That leaves m/9 = 38. Multiply each side by 9 to isolate the m, because m is the numerator and 9 is the denominator. m/9 * 9/1 cancels out. 38 * 9 is 342. Let's check this. 342/9 is 38. 38 - 17 is 21. 21 = 21. There. x = 342.
Answer:
Neither parallel nor perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant line k is y = 3x -2. If not, this is wrong.
For this, you need to put both lines in point-slope form, or the form that line k is already in. This means you only need to convert line m.
-2r + 6v = 18
6v = 2r + 18
v = 2/6r + 18/6
v = 1/3r + 3
Now you can answer the question.
To be parallel, lines must have the same slope (but a different y-intercept). 3 and 1/3 are not the same, so the lines are not parallel.
To be perpendicular, one line must have the opposite reciprocal (fraction flipped and + goes to - or - to +) of the other. While 3 is the reciprocal of 1/3, they are both positive, so they are not perpendicular.
To be the same line, the equations must be absolutely identical, which they aren't.
This leaves the last option: neither.
Let me know if you need a more in-depth explanation of anything here! I'm happy to help!
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, the statement is true, because to divide a fraction we have to turn the second fraction upside down and multiply them. Since a whole number x can be written as x/1, it also applies to the case of dividing a fraction by a whole number.
We can prove it with an example.
Dividing a unit fraction by a whole number
1/2 ÷ 2 = (1x1) / (2x2) = 1/4
Multiplying the unit fractions by a unit fraction with a whole number as a denominator
1/2 x 1/2= (1x1) / (2x2) = 1/4
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
Easy, sub -3 for x
f(-3)=3(-3)-10
f(-3)=-9-10
f(-3)=-19
the value of f(-3) is -19