Answer:
Pretty sure it is A
Explanation:
Both the USSR and the Chinese wanted to collectivize industry and rapidly industrialize. They aslo both lead to unintended consuquences such as famine.
1 and 3 are correct, this is due to the fact that modern technology is constantly growing and other developed nations are feeling threatened or inferior when another developed nation grows further ahead. National security has also grown global, just the threat of a foreign country developing nuclear capability is enough for another country to launch missle strikes or other acts in order to quell the threat of another nuclear capable country. 2 is not correct because industrial strategies are being shared throughout the world constantly and the safety of a country no longer stands by their standing army or navy, but by the threat of nuclear capability or a possibility of retaliation through explosive nature. Even today, most wars are done through the army holding down a line, and the navy/airforce launching long ranged missile attacks of various nature.
Answer:
B. Undernutrition
Explanation:
The reason why A. malnutrition is not correct is that malnutrition arises from lacking a few or one specific nutrient in your body.
Undernutrition arises because of inadequate intake of dietary energy regardless of specific nutrients.
While we use malnutrition in day to day use as an umbrella term for inadequate diets that is not the real meaning of that word.
Answer:
read below
Explanation:
The answers are close so, #1 would not make much sense. Coasts are exactly where land and water meet so... #2 I guess that would also make sense since water deposits sediments and it's where land meets water. #3, um, coasts won't be exactly flat if sediments from water are brought and it's where water and land meet, so it can't be #3. It won't be #4 since the coasts are not very steep.
I would say #2 because sediments from the shelf are what keep the coast complete. You could say #3 but i honestly don't know what else to say.
Answer: The president can issue an executive order instead of a rule if the rule does not support the administration’s goals.
Explanation: The president can give an executive order, congress can overturn the executive order, but the president can prevent that bill from being implemented. So the president has a big influence on rule passing.
***If you found my answer helpful, please give me the brainliest. :) ***
