74 degrees, because angle 1 and 8 add up to 73 degrees, so to make 180 you subtract 180-73 degrees, which makes 112 degrees for angle 9. Angle 9 and 12 are supplementary so they should both add up to 180. That means that angle 12 must be 68. Angles 12, 7, and 6 must add up to 180, so 38+68=106. 180-106=74. Therefore, angle 6 is 74 degrees
Answer:
Using reflexive property (for side), and the transversals of the parallel lines, we can prove the two triangles are congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
- Since AB and DC are parallel and AC is intersecting in the middle, you can make out two pairs of alternate interior angles<em>.</em> These angle pairs are congruent because of the alternate interior angles theorem. The two pairs of congruent angles are: ∠DAC ≅ ∠BCA, and ∠BAC ≅ ∠DCA.
- With the reflexive property, we know side AC ≅ AC.
- Using Angle-Side-Angle theorem, we can prove ΔABC ≅ ΔCDA.
Answer: No he does not meet both of his expectation by cooking 10 batches of spaghetti and 4 batches of lasagna.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since here S represents the number of batches of spaghetti and L represents the total number of lasagna.
And, the chef planed to use at least 4.5 kilograms of pasta and more than 6.3 liters of sauce to cook spaghetti and lasagna.
Which is shown by the below inequality,
----------(1)
And,
--------(2)
By putting S = 10 and L = 4 in the inequality (1),

⇒
(true)
Thus, for the values S = 10 and L = 4 the inequality (1) is followed.
Again By putting S = 10 and L = 4 in the inequality (2),

⇒
( false)
But, for the values S = 10 and L = 4 the inequality (2) is not followed.
Therefore, Antonius does not meet both of his expectations by cooking 10 batches of spaghetti and 4 batches of lasagna.
Answer:the answer would be 20
Step-by-step explanation:
because it is use the most