During the twentieth century, the real income of blue-collar workers in western societies increased significantly overall, although it has dropped in the past 20 years.
White-collar workers went to work in factories instead of going to farming, and within a few years created the new industrial working class of America. Workingin factories was a difficult transition for rural people who were accustomed to living in communities where life was controlled by the hours of available daylight and the natural rhythm of the seasons.
Answer:
A capital gain is, to put it simply, a rise in the value of an investment over its initial purchase price, such as stocks, mutual fund shares, or shares of an exchange traded fund. You have a capital gain if the asset's value rises, and you must pay tax on it
Hope this helped!
Answer:
A
Explanation:
IPO , a synonym for initial public offering is a process of offering to the public new stock issuance through an underwriter.
IPO comes with a lot of benefit , nevertheless financial economist have some concern about it .
Of all the options given in the question , the long run of a new public company , (three to five years from the date of issue) being superior to the overall market returns is the only exception
Answer:
your not giving enough information
Explanation:
Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
