Hypothetical evidence is based on speculation rather than on concrete facts. This is similar to a hypothesis in science.
The closest one I can see is answer D. The writer is asking you to imagine what would happen if leaders wrote their own speeches, instead of telling you what does and is known to happen when they do write their own speeches. (I hope that wasn't too confusing.)
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The statement directly challenges the credibility of the book by age.
The answer for the given question above would be option D. Steinback's primary purpose for writing The Grapes of Wrath is to show how one family's struggle was representative of many others. He wrote this in order to show the poor working and living condition of California's migrant workers in the 1930s.
Answer:
When Richard Kennedy reads the Dr Ferguson Samuel's plan, he doesn’t feel pleased at all. He thought that the journey was quite adventurous. To add to his rage, he also came to know that the The doctor had remained nearly two years without hinting at new explorations and yet he wants to go for the adventure. However despite the disagreement between Richard Kennedy and Dr Ferguson Samuel, both supported each other also
can i get brainliest :)
<span>The famous baseball player, a man known for
his fast pitches, was entered into the Hall of Fame. The appositive
phrase is 'a man known for his fast pitches </span>
