A unit rate means for one, so in this case they mean for one pound of the horse feed which brand sells the highest. You would divide the cost into the number of pounds for each brand. Now, compare all the brands and see which one is highest.
The new mean is 66.09
<u>Explanation:</u>
Mean weight of 20 students = 65kg
One student with 88kg entered the room.
New mean = ?


The above equation can further be written as:

New mean = 
= 66.09
Therefore, the new mean is 66.09
3 lemons
if you have to show your work 4 divided by 12 is 3
Answer:
it
Step-by-step explanation:
it is C hope this helps
9514 1404 393
Answer:
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
Step-by-step explanation:
This inequality can be resolved to a compound inequality:
-7 ≤ (3x -5)/2 ≤ 7
Multiply all parts by 2.
-14 ≤ 3x -5 ≤ 14
Add 5 to all parts.
-9 ≤ 3x ≤ 19
Divide all parts by 3.
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
If you subtract 7 from both sides of the given inequality, it becomes ...
|(3x -5)/2| -7 ≤ 0
Then you're looking for the values of x that bound the region where the graph is below the x-axis. Those are shown in the attachment. For graphing purposes, I find this comparison to zero works well.
__
For an algebraic solution, I like the compound inequality method shown above. That only works well when the inequality is of the form ...
|f(x)| < (some number) . . . . or ≤
If the inequality symbol points away from the absolute value expression, or if the (some number) expression involves the variable, then it is probably better to write the inequality in two parts with appropriate domain specifications:
|f(x)| > g(x) ⇒ f(x) > g(x) for f(x) > 0; or -f(x) > g(x) for f(x) < 0
Any solutions to these inequalities must respect their domains.