An Urban arrangement which expands the city outskirt into a high-wage, private neighborhood. The administration can give impose credits for individuals who are attempting to protect houses. They can do open business organizations where the administration gives a modest rent on government-possessed land to a fundamental industry with a specific end goal to make more occupations. They can tear down open lodging and assemble it in suburbia with the goal that open lodging can be utilized for business organizations or for open business associations. They can rezone so that private ends up plainly business, which can make the property estimations go up, accepting organizations will move in.
Answer:
$0.65
Explanation:
The unit cost per can of soup transferred to finished goods warehouse during March is the total manufacturing costs incurred by both Mixing and Cooking department and Canning Department divided by the total number of cans of soup transferred.
Both departments incurred $122,900 in manufacturing costs i.e($113,400+$9,500) while the total number of gallons of soup transferred to finished goods warehouse was 190,000 cans
Unit cost per can of soup=$122,900/190,000=$0.65
In a SWOT stands for: Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threat. SWO are internal factors while T is an external factor. So if you look at your choices, products, customers and employees are internal and only one is external, which is Competing companies.
The answer is C.
Answer:
c. scarce for households and scarce for economies.
Explanation:
One of the most popular definitions of economic sciences is that this field studies the allocation of scarce resources. This reference to scarcity is a general consensus that exists within economic scientifics and makes no exceptions: the economy is a virtual entity consititued by households, individuals, firms, government and environment. Is not logical to assume scarcity in the economy and plentiful in the households and viceversa.
Answer:
less than the marginal social cost of providing it.
Explanation:
A market produces too much of a good when the price of the good is less than the marginal social cost of providing it.
No consumer would willingly pay for an efficient quantity of a public good, because the marginal benefit to a consumer is less than the marginal social benefit.
Also, If the marginal social benefit received from a good is less than the marginal social cost of production, then society's well-being can be improved if production decreases.
