1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
raketka [301]
1 year ago
7

A Advantages of Product Added Mothed Accounting in National income

Business
1 answer:
Ganezh [65]1 year ago
6 0

It is determined by subtracting the value of the output from the value of the intermediate goods. As double counting, a severe mistake when estimating national income, is concerned, the value-added approach is a widely utilized method for computing national revenue.

A mistake known as double counting in accounting occurs when a transaction is counted more than once for any reason. But when an attempt is made to quantify the new value produced by Gross Output or the value of all investments, it also alludes to a conceptual issue in social accounting practice.

A mistake known as double counting in accounting occurs when a transaction is counted more than once for any reason. But when an attempt is made to quantify the new value produced by Gross Output or the value of all investments, it also alludes to a conceptual issue in social accounting practice.

Learn more about double counting here

brainly.com/question/1098565

#SPJ9

You might be interested in
A company has an investment project that would cost $10 million today and yield a payoff of $15 million in 4 years.
Maslowich
Is the question, what is the Annual Rate of Return?
P=A•e^rt
15=10•e^4r --> ln (e^4r) = ln (3/2)
4r = 0.4055
r = 0.1014
4 0
3 years ago
Which parameter of the marketing mix includes decisions on distribution channels?
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

The answer is Place

Explanation:

In the marketing mix, the process of moving products from the producer to the intended user is called place. In other words, it is how your product is bought and where it is bought. This movement could be through a combination of intermediaries such as distributors, wholesalers and retailers.

6 0
3 years ago
When is it okay to time out<br> someone? In Twitch
VARVARA [1.3K]
When that person spams I guess
3 0
2 years ago
Suppose that the S&amp;P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
2 years ago
In 2002 Ortega's nominal income rose by 4.6 percent and the price level rose by 1.6 percent. We can conclude that Ortega's real
monitta

Answer:

c rose by 3 percent.

Explanation:

Real income is nominal income less price level changes.

Real income = nominal income - changes in price level

4.6 % - 1.6% = 3%

I hope my answer helps you

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • our uncle is about to retire, and he wants to buy an annuity that will provide him with $57,000 of income a year for 20 years, w
    10·1 answer
  • Uh hi . . . . . . . . BANNNA BANNNABANNNA BANNNABANNNA BANNNA BANNNA BANNNA :) B)
    15·2 answers
  • What is the tax penalty for no health insurance 2016?
    6·1 answer
  • Juanita worked hard all year so that she could go to nursing school the following year.    She put her savings into a mutual fun
    12·1 answer
  • Tom O'Brien has a 2-stock portfolio with a total value of $100,000. $47,500 is invested in Stock A with a beta of 0.75 and the r
    10·1 answer
  • Smithson, Inc. produces two types of gas grills: a family model and a deluxe model. Smithson’s controller has decided to use a p
    7·1 answer
  • A portfolio is comprised of 100 shares of Stock A valued at $22 a share, 600 shares of Stock B valued at $17 each, 400 shares of
    12·1 answer
  • Harold works as an operations manager. He uses a project management tool to schedule and manage the steps of the manufacturing p
    5·1 answer
  • In order to start a small business, a student takes out a simple interest loan for $8,000 for 9 months at a rate of 7.50%. How m
    14·1 answer
  • Developmental tasks: question 1 options: a) always involve children. b) occur at all stages of the life cycle. c) always impede
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!