Answer:
There are several reasons. China had been witnessing a long time of armed conflict since the late 1920s, a civil war, then the war against Japan , and then the continuation of the civil war. It had not had enough time for economic recovery. After Japan´s surrender in 1945, the war between Nationalists and Communists resumed after having joined forces to face the Japanese occupiers. In the late 1940s, the government of the Chinese Nationalist Party (Kuomintang) of Gen. Chiang Kai-shek was plagued by widespread corruption; there was high inflation and the public administration was seen as ineffective in solving urgent problems. The Nationalists had the support of the USA that provided weapons and money. Besides, the Communists, led by Mao Zedong, had won much prestige for the fight of their guerrillas against the Japanese; they got weapons and supplies from the Soviet Union. Mao employed successful tactics against the superior Kuomintang armies and defeated them, destroying the Nationalist morale. Chiang and the remnants of his army and administration escaped to Taiwan, off the coast of southern China in 1949.
Explanation:
Answer:
The last choice is correct.
Explanation:
I don't even know how to explain this....it's just not in the Constitution.
Answer: Buying with margin means buying an asset using leverage and borrowing a bank balance
Explanation:
Buying with margin means buying an asset using leverage and borrowing a bank balance. It refers to the initial payment made to the bank for the asset that is purchased. The margin values in the investor's account are the guarantee of the borrowed funds. Before buying, the investor must be approved and open an account with the bank.
I'm not sure what the question is exactly? St. Patrick's day is a Christian celebration of a man named Saint Patrick that helped spread Christianity in Ireland.... Today many people use the holiday as an excuse to wear green and get drunk rather than celebrate the growth of Christianity.
Incomplete question. However, I answered from a general English perspective.
Answer:
<u>It refers to the inability to provide what is necessary for something or someone that we possess.</u>
Explanation:
We can see the meaning of such expression from the point of view of someone who is speaking on behave of a group stating<em>out his displeasure</em> that they're unable to provide what is necessary for their own; which can either be a person, or a property.
For example, a father and mother unable to provide enough food for their family may say in a low tone, "we can't take care of our own," referring to their children.