1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katen-ka-za [31]
2 years ago
11

What are the pros and cons of mercantilism for England?

History
1 answer:
Blizzard [7]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

8 Pros and Cons of Mercantilism

Aug 23, 2015 by Brandon Gaille

During the Colonial Period in Europe, mercantilism was a common system of economic development that was enforced. A mother nation would control the economy of its colonies through the regulation of trade. Certain products, such as precious metals or expensive spices, would be eliminated from trade if necessary so that wealth could accumulate for the mother nation and then trickle down to its colonies. By purchasing local goods first, economies could be stimulated, but it also limited the types of goods that were made available. Here are some of the other key points to consider when evaluating the pros and cons of mercantilism.

What Are the Pros of Mercantilism?

1. It encourages the complete development of all natural resources.

Many economies today have a lot of waste that occurs because there is an emphasis on using foreign trade to fill in product or service gaps. Through mercantilism, there is a need to research and develop all possible resources to their greatest extent to support the local and mother nation economy.

2. It encourages trade deficits for foreign nations.

The goal of mercantilism is to build wealth, which means any opportunity to do so is encouraged. From a trading perspective, raw materials were a hot commodity for nations participating in mercantilism because they could be refined into manufactured goods and resold to foreign nations at a high price. It’s a perfect example of what it means to buy low and sell high.

3. It naturally reduces unemployment rates.

Because there is such an emphasis on developing local resources, jobs are created to make this happen. From the finding of resources to creating innovative new products from them to selling in new markets, people are needed at every stage to make this happen. Of course many of the jobs are based in the mother nation, but there are additional opportunities created in each colony as well.

4. Cultural exchanges are encouraged to promote trade.

The rules of business have not really changed since the beginning of time. First and foremost, before any long-lasting relationship can be created, a relationship must be formed. Because the foundation of a system of mercantilism is to continue increasing business opportunities, many cultural exchanges are encouraged and these influences then enhance the standards of living that people experience.

What Are the Cons of Mercantilism?

1. It creates high levels of resentment.

Trickle-down economics works on paper. It just doesn’t work well in real life thanks to the inherent greed that so many people have. Why give others money when you can keep it for yourself? The rich tend to get richer in a system of mercantilism and the working class gets to be stagnant at best. Eventually this creates resentment, which leads to rebellion, and ultimately it led to many colonies seeking out their own independence.

2. It creates a preference for the mother nation to always be first.

Many colonies are also treated as a foreign nation in a system of mercantilism. This means the colonies are forced to sell their local raw materials for a bargain basement price and then be forced to purchase manufactured goods at a higher price than necessary. This creates an even wider wealth gap between the different income classes.

3. There is always a risk of local raw materials and resources running out.

Because mercantilism is based on the complete use of natural resources, there will always be a day when those resources run out. Natural resources are finite in nature, so even if there is an extensive reserve in place that can be accessed, that reserve will one day run out. If that happens sooner rather than later, then the entire economy can collapse.

4. The system is ultimately quite inefficient.

Because materials and goods are shipped back and forth between colonies and their mother nation, the price of goods is inflated more than it needs to be. Even with modern shipping methods, it costs less to manufacture goods locally where raw resources are available than it does to ship those items back and forth. Because of this, it also creates vulnerabilities in both economies should those shipments be intercepted by someone else.

The pros and cons of mercantilism show that it is a system that is largely out of practice due to the high risks that are involved. For economies that are rich in raw materials, it could still have certain benefits. With globalization occurring at a rapid pace, however, a movement toward isolation could do more harm than good.

Pros and Cons

You might be interested in
The book of the dead was clearly thought to be very imporant means to everlasting life by contemporary egyptians, who often brou
Marina86 [1]

Answer: The Egyptian Book of the Dead is a collection of spells which enable the soul of the deceased to navigate the afterlife. The famous title was given the work by western scholars; the actual title would translate as The Book of Coming Forth by Day or Spells for Going Forth by Day.

A more apt translation to English would be The Egyptian Book of Life as the purpose of the work is to assure one, not only of the survival of bodily death, but the promise of eternal life in a realm very like the world the soul had left behind. The spells provided this assurance through precise detail of what to expect after death and the kind of knowledge required to reach paradise.

Although the work is often referred to as "the Ancient Egyptian Bible" it is no such thing although the two works share the similarity of being ancient compilations of texts written at different times eventually gathered together in book form. The Book of the Dead was never codified and no two copies of the work are exactly the same. They were created specifically for each individual who could afford to purchase one as a kind of manual to help them after death. Egyptologist Geralidine Pinch explains:

The Egyptian Book of the Dead is a term coined in the nineteenth century CE for a body of texts known to the Ancient Egyptians as the Spells for Going Forth by Day. After the Book of the Dead was first translated by Egyptologists, it gained a place in the popular imagination as the Bible of the Ancient Egyptians. The comparison is very inappropriate. The Book of the Dead was not the central holy book of Egyptian religion. It was just one of a series of manuals composed to assist the spirits of the elite dead to achieve and maintain a full afterlife. (26)

The afterlife was considered to be a continuation of life on earth and, after one had passed through various difficulties and judgment in the Hall of Truth, a paradise which was a perfect reflection of one's life on earth. After the soul had been justified in the Hall of Truth it passed on to cross over Lily Lake to rest in the Field of Reeds where one would find all that one had lost in life and could enjoy it eternally. In order to reach that paradise, however, one needed to know where to go, how to address certain gods, what to say at certain times, and how to comport one's self in the land of the dead; which is why one would find an afterlife manual extremely useful.

HAVING A BOOK OF THE DEAD IN ONE'S TOMB WOULD BE THE EQUIVALENT OF A STUDENT IN THE MODERN DAY GETTING THEIR HANDS ON ALL THE TEST ANSWERS THEY WOULD EVER NEED.

The History

The Book of the Dead originated from concepts depicted in tomb paintings and inscriptions from as early as the Third Dynasty of Egypt (c. 2670 - 2613 BCE). By the 12th Dynasty (1991 - 1802 BCE) these spells, with accompanying illustrations, were written on papyrus and placed in tombs and graves with the dead.

Their purpose, as historian Margaret Bunson explains, "was to instruct the deceased on how to overcome the dangers of the afterlife by enabling them to assume the form of serveral mythical creatures and to give them the passwords necessary for admittance to certain stages of the underworld" (47).

They also served, however, to provide the soul with fore-knowledge of what would be expected at every stage. Having a Book of the Dead in one's tomb would be the equivalent of a student in the modern day getting their hands on all the test answers they would ever need in every grade of school.

At some point prior to 1600 BCE the different spells had been divided in chapters and, by the time of the New Kingdom (c. 1570 - c. 1069 BCE), the book was extremely popular. Scribes who were experts in spells would be consulted to fashion custom-made books for an individual or a family. Bunson notes, "These spells and passwords were not part of a ritual but were fashioned for the deceased, to be recited in the afterlife" (47). If someone were sick, and feared they might die, they would go to a scribe and have them write up a book of spells for the afterlife. The scribe would need to know what kind of life the person had lived in order to surmise the type of journey they could expect after death; then the appropriate spells would be written specifically for that individual.

3 0
3 years ago
What do you think would of happened if Theodosius had not divided the Roman Empire?
kvv77 [185]
If Theodosius had not divided the Roman Empire, I believe that the Roman Empire would not have been as corrupt and would have been stronger against it's enemies and it would stay alive longer. But, if he never did split the Roman Empire, then it would've kept growing to the point where it was too large and too hard to control, leading to Rome's fall.
8 0
3 years ago
Help me pleasee :(( How do third parties influence the government?
Wittaler [7]
Third parties influence the government by, by introducing new ideas and changing the outcome of certain elections.
8 0
1 year ago
*PLEASE ANSWER NOW**
Artemon [7]

Answer:

I think it is meaning the impact of immigrants.

Explanation:

Fun fact: Earth is purple uWu.

5 0
3 years ago
Who were the main supporters of suffrage during the late 1800's and early 1900's ?
maksim [4K]

Answer:

Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and Lucretia Mott.

Explanation:

Branliest pl

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The united states and the philippines were at war with each other for how many years at the turn of the 19th century
    10·1 answer
  • What was the main impact of the Anti-Federalists on the adoption of the US Constitution?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the leader of the United States want to write a new constitution
    14·1 answer
  • During the late 1800s strict immigration laws led to a shortage of workers in big city factories. true or false
    6·1 answer
  • While the vice president’s role as president of the Senate is largely ceremonial, in cases of a tie vote (50-50) on a bill, the
    5·1 answer
  • In the Neolithic period, agriculture and raising stock became humankind’s major food sources. Which area transitioned to these a
    7·1 answer
  • After reaching a high in 2009, the U.S. prison population declined for the third consecutive year in 2012.
    9·1 answer
  • What is believed to be the main cause of the Bantu migrations that contributed to growth in South Africa?
    6·2 answers
  • A grounded conductor shall not be connected to normally noncurrent-carrying metal parts of equipment on the ______ side of the s
    12·1 answer
  • What was the thinking behind the policy of containment?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!