1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katen-ka-za [31]
3 years ago
11

What are the pros and cons of mercantilism for England?

History
1 answer:
Blizzard [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

8 Pros and Cons of Mercantilism

Aug 23, 2015 by Brandon Gaille

During the Colonial Period in Europe, mercantilism was a common system of economic development that was enforced. A mother nation would control the economy of its colonies through the regulation of trade. Certain products, such as precious metals or expensive spices, would be eliminated from trade if necessary so that wealth could accumulate for the mother nation and then trickle down to its colonies. By purchasing local goods first, economies could be stimulated, but it also limited the types of goods that were made available. Here are some of the other key points to consider when evaluating the pros and cons of mercantilism.

What Are the Pros of Mercantilism?

1. It encourages the complete development of all natural resources.

Many economies today have a lot of waste that occurs because there is an emphasis on using foreign trade to fill in product or service gaps. Through mercantilism, there is a need to research and develop all possible resources to their greatest extent to support the local and mother nation economy.

2. It encourages trade deficits for foreign nations.

The goal of mercantilism is to build wealth, which means any opportunity to do so is encouraged. From a trading perspective, raw materials were a hot commodity for nations participating in mercantilism because they could be refined into manufactured goods and resold to foreign nations at a high price. It’s a perfect example of what it means to buy low and sell high.

3. It naturally reduces unemployment rates.

Because there is such an emphasis on developing local resources, jobs are created to make this happen. From the finding of resources to creating innovative new products from them to selling in new markets, people are needed at every stage to make this happen. Of course many of the jobs are based in the mother nation, but there are additional opportunities created in each colony as well.

4. Cultural exchanges are encouraged to promote trade.

The rules of business have not really changed since the beginning of time. First and foremost, before any long-lasting relationship can be created, a relationship must be formed. Because the foundation of a system of mercantilism is to continue increasing business opportunities, many cultural exchanges are encouraged and these influences then enhance the standards of living that people experience.

What Are the Cons of Mercantilism?

1. It creates high levels of resentment.

Trickle-down economics works on paper. It just doesn’t work well in real life thanks to the inherent greed that so many people have. Why give others money when you can keep it for yourself? The rich tend to get richer in a system of mercantilism and the working class gets to be stagnant at best. Eventually this creates resentment, which leads to rebellion, and ultimately it led to many colonies seeking out their own independence.

2. It creates a preference for the mother nation to always be first.

Many colonies are also treated as a foreign nation in a system of mercantilism. This means the colonies are forced to sell their local raw materials for a bargain basement price and then be forced to purchase manufactured goods at a higher price than necessary. This creates an even wider wealth gap between the different income classes.

3. There is always a risk of local raw materials and resources running out.

Because mercantilism is based on the complete use of natural resources, there will always be a day when those resources run out. Natural resources are finite in nature, so even if there is an extensive reserve in place that can be accessed, that reserve will one day run out. If that happens sooner rather than later, then the entire economy can collapse.

4. The system is ultimately quite inefficient.

Because materials and goods are shipped back and forth between colonies and their mother nation, the price of goods is inflated more than it needs to be. Even with modern shipping methods, it costs less to manufacture goods locally where raw resources are available than it does to ship those items back and forth. Because of this, it also creates vulnerabilities in both economies should those shipments be intercepted by someone else.

The pros and cons of mercantilism show that it is a system that is largely out of practice due to the high risks that are involved. For economies that are rich in raw materials, it could still have certain benefits. With globalization occurring at a rapid pace, however, a movement toward isolation could do more harm than good.

Pros and Cons

You might be interested in
How much of a say did people in the American colonies have over their trade laws
IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:According to Robert Calhoon, between 40 and 45 percent of the white population in the Thirteen Colonies supported the Patriots' cause, between 15 and 20 percent supported the Loyalists, and the remainder were neutral or kept a low profile.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What can you infer about California from the information presented in the Gold Rush Video? ***Be sure you have watched the assig
julsineya [31]

Answer:

Before 1849, relatively few people live there.

Explanation:

just took the test and got it right.

8 0
3 years ago
Help meeeeee plssssss
liberstina [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Capture of Ormuz in 1507 occurred when the Portuguese Afonso de Albuquerque attacked Hormuz Island to establish the Fortress of Ormuz.

7 0
2 years ago
5. Bacon's Rebellion is an example of:
nlexa [21]

The correct answer is turning point for the way the laws of colonial Virginia distinguished people of different races

In 1676, one hundred years before the declaration of independence, the state of Virginia was the scene of the so-called Bacon Rebellion, in which landowners, slaves and servants came together, and which can only be stifled with the dispatch of English troops. It began as a product of the demand of the wealthy landowner Nathaniel Bacon, whose properties were located in the border area, for a more effective war policy against "the Indian". This demand to local authorities extended to the denunciation of an unfair tax policy, the arbitrary distribution of public offices and the lack of protection for farmers against the indigenous threat, in “a mixture of populist resentment against the rich and border hatred against the Indians ”. (Apart from the huge historical-social distances, we could say that it is similar to a Trump that today rages against the political and economic establishment while agitating a strongly xenophobic and anti-immigrant program).

The significance of this rebellion was that it brought together a heterogeneous social spectrum, attracting the dissatisfaction of slaves and servants against their living conditions, showing a potentially dangerous social union. In addition to the problem of indigenous hostility and the danger of slave revolts, the colonial elite had to do with the class anger of the poor whites - the servants, the tenants, the urban poor, the landless, the taxpayers, soldiers and sailors. In fact, after the Bacon Rebellion in 1760, "eighteen new attempts were made to overthrow the colonial governments and eight black revolts in South Carolina and New York." (The Other History of the United States). In this context, racism was the preferred ideological artifact used by the dominant classes to prevent the development of these social ties. But under the strong fiscal pressure that ensued the wars waged by England, which increased poverty in the lower strata and affected sectors of the local elites, they began to defend nationalist ideals as a way to monopolize the extraction of resources while unleashing potential rebellions. depending on national unity.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a lasting consequence of European imperialism?
Blizzard [7]

Answer:

bad boy/girl, no cheating

anwer is 1.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 2. Portugal and Spain were rivals in the exploration of the seas. State two reasons why both nations were sending out voyages of
    10·1 answer
  • Please help asap! Help me pleaseeeee
    10·1 answer
  • The kingdom of kush became famous for making iron(true or false)
    11·1 answer
  • What was the cash crop that helped jamestown survive and prosper?
    12·1 answer
  • compare the lifestyles of hunter-gatherers with those of settlers of early agricultural communities. the hunter and gather era i
    7·1 answer
  • Which US president established the Consumer Bill of Rights in 1962?
    6·1 answer
  • The first cultures in New Mexico __
    5·1 answer
  • Which statements about the reign of louis 14 are true
    13·1 answer
  • Based on the chart above, which of the following statements is true?
    8·2 answers
  • Write one or two paragraphs identifying the factors that can influence human development. Describe at least four different facto
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!