The argument made by Holmes was that the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
<h3>What is the case of Schenck v. United States?</h3>
The Court determined that a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.
Hence, the Justice of the state made an argument that the the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Schenck v. United States
<em>brainly.com/question/2764676</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The New Deal helped America.
Here are three...<span>The Mondragon Corporation, a federation of co-ops that currently employs 85,066 people. It is in the Basque region.<span>A bakery pays all staff the same amount of money based on the profitability of the business. Workers vote to make business decisions. </span></span>
The British Raj created a civil-service system to rule the country.
