Answer:
The author believes that the best approach towards free speech in the private sector is for the private entities to censor speech by their users.
Explanation:
According to the author, private entities were responsible for the censoring of free speech not the state.
He went on to say that these private sectors have the rights to offer these regulations on their different platforms and make exclusions to certain speech of their members.
Evidence can be see in the third paragraph. The author implied here that private sector has a right to invoke the first amendment clause that limits speeches that are lawless, full of threat and obscenity.
Increasing or increased in quality, degree, or force by successive additions.
This is my onion to this question i think its:
D-"He believes that we should remove Saddam Hussein and his regime from power immediately"
Your Welcome :)
Individuals should not be allowed to own exotic pets. These animals usually have temperature needs. An example of this would be komodo dragons. They need a rather warm environment in order to survive. If the person lives in a cold climate, the lizard will inevitably end up going into a cage. Going off of that, the majority of these animals are held in cages(especially if large.) Lastly, Some exotic animals could be harmful or dangerous depending on species. If a owner decides to adopt a large cat, it is recommended to declaw them because of their massive claws. This can lead to infections in the cat’s paws and makes it very uncomfortable for the animal.
Thx for the topic